Chemical Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Sponsored links

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Diastereocontrol in Julia-Kocienski olefination  (Read 4468 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 29
  • I'm a mole!
Diastereocontrol in Julia-Kocienski olefination
« on: June 04, 2009, 05:28:56 AM »


In the modified Julia olefination, called Julia-Kocienski olefination (, the initial step in the reaction mechanism is attack of the organometallic reagent on the aldehyde, either from Si or Re face, to yield (not respectively) the anti and syn adducts. The anti isomer evolves after rearrangement and beta-eilimination into the trans-isomer, whereas the syn isomer reacts to yield the cis-isomer.

Studies have shown that the type of the metal (Li or K) has an influence on the direction of the initial attack, where with lithium, a chelate can be formed with the aldehyde's oxygen and the benzothiazole's nitrogen (see within the attached hyperlink, vide supra) in a "closed transition state", leading to the syn isomer; whereas the potassium, apparently due to its relative larger atomic radius, does not form a chelate, but leading to the so called "open transition state" and the anti isomer (see the attached picture file).

My question is: why does this chelate necessarily evolve into the syn isomer, whereas the non-chelate ends up in the anti-isomer? Particularly in the potassium case, which factor here prevents any other orientation between the carbanion and the aldehyde which hypothetically could lead to the trans-isomer?

Thanks in advance!



  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Mole Snacks: +160/-24
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1417
  • Mediocrity is a handrail -Charles Louis d'Secondat
Re: Diastereocontrol in Julia-Kocienski olefination
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2009, 06:32:04 AM »

are you familiar with the bassindale model for carbonyl addition?
Knowing why you got a question wrong is better than knowing that you got a question right.

Pages: [1]   Go Up

Mitch Andre Garcia's Chemical Forums 2003-Present.

Page created in 0.073 seconds with 24 queries.