April 19, 2024, 01:48:38 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form  (Read 10796 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rcole23

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« on: August 09, 2009, 02:00:28 PM »
how can i take this


0.04 (1.6 - x) (2.4 - x) = 4 x2


and rearrange it into the form ax2 (squared) + bx + c = 0

??

any help appreciated.

Offline Astrokel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 989
  • Mole Snacks: +65/-10
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2009, 02:28:12 PM »
Simple expansion?
No matters what results are waiting for us, it's nothing but the DESTINY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline rcole23

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2009, 02:40:11 PM »
Simple expansion?

So would the next step be...


(0.064 - .04x)(0.096 - .04x) = 4x2 (squared)

???


Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3652
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2009, 03:42:56 PM »
Simple expansion?

So would the next step be...


(0.064 - .04x)(0.096 - .04x) = 4x2

???

No, there is no need to multiply both terms by 0.04. Can you multiply out the (1.6 - x) (2.4 - x)  terms?

Offline rcole23

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2009, 06:54:19 PM »
OK, I thought that maybe I would have to expand the brackets?  I am a little confused because the answer has to equal 0.

So, how about

0.04 (1.6 - x) (2.4 - x) = 4 x2 (multiply (1.6 - x) (2.4 - x) together)

0.04 * 3.84 - X2 (squared) = 4X2 (squared)

0.1536 - x2 = 4x2  ???

« Last Edit: August 09, 2009, 07:23:53 PM by rcole23 »

Offline rcole23

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2009, 08:20:35 PM »
OK getting closer I think.  ;D  I was reading up about expanding binomials and came up w/ this.

I used the FOIL method (first, outside, inside, last)

I please ask if someone can check up on my negative and positive signs?  I think I have made mistakes there.

0.04 (1.6 - x) (2.4 - x) = 4 x2

0.04 + 3.84 - 1.6x + 2.4x + x2 = 4x2

(.064 - .04x)(2.4 - x)

foil

.1536 - .064x - .096x + .04x2 = 4x2

.1536 - .064x - .096x + .04x2 - 4x2 = 0

.1536 - 0.16x - 3.96x2 = 0

Offline UG

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 822
  • Mole Snacks: +134/-15
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #6 on: August 09, 2009, 11:11:11 PM »
OK getting closer I think.  ;D  I was reading up about expanding binomials and came up w/ this.

I used the FOIL method (first, outside, inside, last)

I please ask if someone can check up on my negative and positive signs?  I think I have made mistakes there.

0.04 (1.6 - x) (2.4 - x) = 4 x2

0.04 + 3.84 - 1.6x + 2.4x + x2 = 4x2

(.064 - .04x)(2.4 - x)

foil

.1536 - .064x - .096x + .04x2 = 4x2

.1536 - .064x - .096x + .04x2 - 4x2 = 0

.1536 - 0.16x - 3.96x2 = 0
0.04 (1.6 - x) (2.4 - x) = 4x2
0.04(3.84 - 1.6x - 2.4x + x2) = 4x2
0.1536 - 0.064x - 0.096x + 0.04x2 = 4x2
0.1536 - 0.16x + 0.04x2 = 4x2
3.96x2 + 0.16x - 0.1536 = 0

Offline rcole23

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2009, 07:39:18 AM »
Thank you, I am at work right now but will rework the math when I get home just to practice.  Only took me 12 hrs to find out how to do this question lol  :o, I will enjoy the answer...

Offline rcole23

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2009, 01:50:54 PM »
OK getting closer I think.  ;D  I was reading up about expanding binomials and came up w/ this.

I used the FOIL method (first, outside, inside, last)

I please ask if someone can check up on my negative and positive signs?  I think I have made mistakes there.

0.04 (1.6 - x) (2.4 - x) = 4 x2

0.04 + 3.84 - 1.6x + 2.4x + x2 = 4x2

(.064 - .04x)(2.4 - x)

foil

.1536 - .064x - .096x + .04x2 = 4x2

.1536 - .064x - .096x + .04x2 - 4x2 = 0

.1536 - 0.16x - 3.96x2 = 0
0.04 (1.6 - x) (2.4 - x) = 4x2
0.04(3.84 - 1.6x - 2.4x + x2) = 4x2
0.1536 - 0.064x - 0.096x + 0.04x2 = 4x2
0.1536 - 0.16x + 0.04x2 = 4x2
3.96x2 + 0.16x - 0.1536 = 0



Actually how do yo umake the 0.16x and the 3.92x2 positive and the .1563 a negatitive???  This is the answer I am getting.  I am not sure of how or why in the last step you switched most of your signs.


0.04 (1.6 - x) (2.4 - x) = 4 x2

0.04 (3.84 - 1.6x - 2.4x + x2) = 4x2

.1536 - .064x - .096x + .04x2 = 4x2

.1536 - .064x - .096x + .04x2 - 4x2 = 0

.1563 - .16x - 3.96x2 = 0

rearranged...

-3.96x2 - .16x + .1563 = 0
« Last Edit: August 10, 2009, 02:20:08 PM by rcole23 »

Offline UG

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 822
  • Mole Snacks: +134/-15
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #9 on: August 11, 2009, 02:02:10 AM »
They're both the same  :)

-3.96x2 - 0.16x + 0.1563 = 0 is the same as 3.96x2 + 0.16x - 0.1536 = 0


Offline rcole23

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2009, 08:22:36 PM »
They're both the same  :)

-3.96x2 - 0.16x + 0.1563 = 0 is the same as 3.96x2 + 0.16x - 0.1536 = 0



Hmm I know it has been a few days but I still don't get this comment.  How is -3.96x2 the same as positive 3.96x2 and so on for the other answers?  When I factor the rearranged quadratic equation into my quadratic formula with negatives and possitives I would get toally different answers?

Offline UG

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 822
  • Mole Snacks: +134/-15
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2009, 12:28:00 AM »
No, when you solve for 'x' you should get the same two roots for 'x'
There are the same because all of the signs have been reversed.

Imagine this:
-15 + 6 -7 + 16 = 0

Now if you reverse all of the signs

15 - 6 + 7 - 16 what do you get?  :)

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27652
  • Mole Snacks: +1800/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Hello rearranging equilibrium equation into quadratic form
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2009, 03:20:31 AM »
They have the same roots, but they are not identical when it comes to their plots/values taken - the one with +3.96x2 has a lower bound and a minimum value, the one with -3.96x2 has an upper bound and maximum value (for the same x).
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Sponsored Links