Chemical Forums: A Socratic Model of Chemical Education
November 20, 2009, 11:40:32 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  



Google Sponsors


Content
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: detecting cytokeratins  (Read 481 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Marija
Regular Member
***

Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 13



View Profile WWW
« on: November 01, 2009, 09:05:02 AM »

Hi!
I was browsing through the forum and I wasn't able to find anything about my problem/question so I decided to open a new topic (I hope this kind of topic doesn't exist yet and if it does I apologize for missing it).

OK, I have a question regarding the detection of cytokeratins. When we try to detect cytokeratins why do we use immunocytochemical methods or in situ hybridization and NOT autohistoradiography?

I'd really appreciate it if someone can answer my question, 'cause I'm preparing for a test on my university and it's really frustrating not knowing where to find this answer (I was looking in my book and found nothing).

Thanks. Smiley
Logged

On every street in every city, there's a nobody who dreams of being a somebody.

aHerraez
Regular Member
***

Mole Snacks: +4/-1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 16


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2009, 09:01:06 AM »

Hi Marija
Can you specify what do you mean by autohistoradiography? To me, it sounds like an autoradiography of a histological preparation, and that would fit within cytochemical methods. The use of radioactivity or fluorescence for the detection doesn't change the rationale of the methods, it's just a convenience.
Logged

JGK
Chemist
Full Member
*****

Mole Snacks: +33/-15
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 369



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2009, 10:52:56 AM »

I couldnt find a definition for autohistoradiography on the web.However, breaking it down into compnent s does it involve the use of a radiolabeled chemical to bind to the cytokeratin in order to produce an image on an autoradiograph?

Maybe there isn'ta material that will bind successfully to the cytokeratin
Logged

When confronted by a difficult problem, you can solve it more easily by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
Marija
Regular Member
***

Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 13



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2009, 10:43:46 AM »

Hello to both of you. I'm sorry I didn't reply earlier. Sometimes it's hard to translate our (Slovenian) expressions to English, but I was sure the expression "autohistoradiography" was often used (I also found it on the internet). Anyway, I got the answer  - we don't use autohistoradiography 'cause it takes too much time (we often try to analyze cytokeratins to detect cancer/tumors and that's why we need to be as fast as possible).

Thanks anyway for your help. And if you still want to know what I meant by "autohistoradiography" I would be happy to tell you, just let me know (so I won't be dealing with my bad English for nothing). But you both kind of got the right picture (by telling from your posts), so I think the only problem was in my confusing expression.  Grin
Logged

On every street in every city, there's a nobody who dreams of being a somebody.
Borek
Mr. pH
Administrator
Deity Member
*****

Mole Snacks: +707/-219
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 11614

no personal text at the moment...


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2009, 11:07:21 AM »

Sometimes it's hard to translate our (Slovenian)

As if translating from Polish was easier  Undecided
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP
Mitch Andre Garcia's Chemical Forums 2003-Present.

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.044 seconds with 18 queries.