Chemical Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Sponsored links

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Gaussian 09 beginner question: how to keep topological connections of molecules?  (Read 650 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

zhk2611

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1

Hi guys,
I am new to the Gaussian program. Now I am using Gaussian 09W to optimize the geometry of some organic molecules. The problem I encountered- while using keyword Opt, the program often gives out results with different topological connections of carbon atoms (i.e. breaking rings of carbon atoms in the input structure and forming rings elsewhere). So is there a way to tell the program to keep the bonds not-to-be-eliminated?
Thanks. 
Logged

ropy

  • New Member
  • **
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5

make sure the input molecule is close to the local energy minima . Dont give any strained molecule. As gaussian 09 finds closest "local" minima not the "global" ,SCF is converging to the minima closest to your input and stopping there . You may find many optimised structure according to your input if you play with it a little bit . 
Logged

curiouscat

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Mole Snacks: +105/-30
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2468

Hi guys,
I am new to the Gaussian program. Now I am using Gaussian 09W to optimize the geometry of some organic molecules. The problem I encountered- while using keyword Opt, the program often gives out results with different topological connections of carbon atoms (i.e. breaking rings of carbon atoms in the input structure and forming rings elsewhere). So is there a way to tell the program to keep the bonds not-to-be-eliminated?
Thanks.

No. You can't. Not typically. There are ways to constrain bond lenths etc. in DFT codes but not typically used.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Mitch Andre Garcia's Chemical Forums 2003-Present.

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 23 queries.