March 29, 2024, 10:29:45 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: conformation flexibility  (Read 1851 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kriggy

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1519
  • Mole Snacks: +135/-16
conformation flexibility
« on: February 02, 2014, 08:54:26 AM »
Why is that that complex M40401 favors folding into octaherdal geometry and M40404 not?

The paper doesnt specify why is that. I suppose it has something to do with the methyl substituents and direction of that bond relative to the fused benzen rings - the bond benzene-nitrogen to be more specific. But I have realy hard time imagining the structure in 3D
Could you give me some hints or help?
Thans

Offline Radu

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 87
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-0
Re: conformation flexibility
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2014, 04:58:42 PM »
        Humm, I think it's about the equilibrium pentagonal bipyramid ::equil:: mono-capped octhaedra, which, dependng on the conditions, is totally shifted to the left or to the right.
        If you look at  M40401, you'll notice that methyl and phenyl are eclipsed on each side, which destabilizes the pentagonal bypiramid and shifts the geometry to a possible one where there are no such  repulsions. On the other hand,  there are no many  differences for the two geometries
 in terms of repulsions between bulky groups for M40404, so here orbital energetics may play a crucial role. ( sp3d3 likes the pentagonal bipyramidal geometry.)
          Do you think that's the answer, what do you say? ( I purely rationalized, I found nothing about NC=7 Mn2+ compounds.)

Offline kriggy

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1519
  • Mole Snacks: +135/-16
Re: conformation flexibility
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2014, 05:13:50 PM »
Yes this sounds reasonable. I will probably consult it with someone at school when next semester starts.
Thanks for help

Sponsored Links