April 25, 2024, 06:37:21 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Rf value  (Read 2946 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline joe900

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Rf value
« on: May 18, 2015, 04:04:59 PM »
how it is possible that when i made TLC for my compound, chromium complex Cr(acac)3 and put it and its reference (pure complex) on the same plate, one of them has Rf=0.6 and the other has about 0.3? does contaminations change value of Rf and make it different? i think there should be two spots: from contamination and from product...

Offline MOTOBALL

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 371
  • Mole Snacks: +50/-5
Re: Rf value
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2015, 05:20:40 PM »
The very great difference in Rf values shows that your compound is not Cr(acac)3; the presence of impurities will not, in general, affect the Rf value of a compound.  Which Rf corresponds to the
Cr(acac)3 standard ?

What is the absorbent & the developing solvent ?

Offline joe900

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Rf value
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2015, 03:32:42 AM »
silicagel plate and dichloromethane-methanol (99:1), Rf for standard is 0.6. But the colour of the product is right...maybe i did some mistake during preparation

Offline kriggy

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1520
  • Mole Snacks: +136/-16
Re: Rf value
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2015, 10:17:21 AM »
Well color is not very good indicator. I had compound with same color as the pure one but it had like 60% impurities.
« Last Edit: May 19, 2015, 11:21:44 AM by Dan »

Offline MOTOBALL

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 371
  • Mole Snacks: +50/-5
Re: Rf value
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2015, 12:51:51 PM »
Chromatography on silica gel is based on adsorption to, and desorption from, the very polar solid phase.  Your unknown has Rf = 0.3, and is more strongly bound to the solid phase than the authentic Cr(acac)3; the unknown is therefore more polar than Cr(acac)3.

I don't know the synthesis of Cr(acac)3, but is it possible that your unknown is not fully substituted ??

Could your unknown be something like Cr(acac)2(OH)1 or Cr(acac)1(OH)2 ?

Sponsored Links