April 26, 2024, 01:22:51 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Equilibrium thermodynamics  (Read 2568 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline orgo814

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 412
  • Mole Snacks: +11/-6
Equilibrium thermodynamics
« on: July 07, 2015, 10:33:42 PM »
This is a tricky question or so it seems: (d= delta)

The standard Gibbs energy change, dG, for a certain chemical reaction is -10 kJ/mol. What is the equilibrium constant at 300 K?

So I thought this would be easy... dG= -RTlnK. But they gave me standard dG. I need to find the dG at 300 K in order to do this problem. At first I thought maybe getting K for the standard (298 K) reaction and then using van't hoff equation to find K at 300 K but I have no way of finding out dH when I don't know dS or the actual reaction. Please help

Offline mjc123

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2053
  • Mole Snacks: +296/-12
Re: Equilibrium thermodynamics
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2015, 04:20:41 AM »
"Standard ΔG" means standard conditions at a specified temperature, not necessarily 298K. If there is no other information in the question, it means standard ΔG at 300K. Though a better way to express it would have been:
"The standard Gibbs energy change, dG, at 300K for a certain chemical reaction is -10 kJ/mol. What is the equilibrium constant?"

Offline orgo814

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 412
  • Mole Snacks: +11/-6
Re: Equilibrium thermodynamics
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2015, 10:55:51 AM »
I calculated it that way but did not get right answer. Supposedly right answer is 55. I get 0.018

Offline Yggdrasil

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3215
  • Mole Snacks: +485/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Physical Biochemist
Re: Equilibrium thermodynamics
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2015, 11:31:04 AM »
When I plug in those numbers, I get K = 55.  You may be having problems remembering the negative signs in your equations.  For example, ΔG for the reaction is negative.  Would you expect the equilibrium constant to be > 1 or < 1?

Offline orgo814

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 412
  • Mole Snacks: +11/-6
Re: Equilibrium thermodynamics
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2015, 11:50:09 AM »
Yea you're right I missed the negative sign. Thanks

Sponsored Links