Okay, I missed that. I just skimmed through and thought it would give 2-cyclohexenone. None the less, I think I'd look up the literature methods. If there is only one, there may be a reason. If there are several, that may also indicate the submitters were not too pleased with the prior methods. I'd even assume they actually tried the literature methods before developing their own.
I cannot determine which is the better course of action, five minutes in the laboratory to save a week in the library or five minutes in the library to save a week in the lab. Needless to say, I don't know anything.