April 26, 2024, 08:32:05 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Another partial pressure equilibrium problem  (Read 2240 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline docnet

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 46
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Another partial pressure equilibrium problem
« on: September 26, 2016, 03:16:03 AM »
Kp = 5.3E5 for the reaction N2 (g) + 3H2 (g)  ::equil:: 2NH3 (g)

when a certain partial pressure of ammonia gas is put into an otherwise empty rigid vessel at the same temperature, equilibrium is reached when 50 percent of the original ammonia has decomposed. what was the original partial pressure of ammonia before any decomposition occurred?

I wasn't sure how to approach the problem, so I set up an equilibrium expression and tried to express all partial pressures in terms of PNH3.

I made the following assumptions:

-The partial pressure of nitrogen gas must be half of the equilibrium partial pressure of ammonia
-The partial pressure of hydrogen gas must be one and a half times the equilibrium partial pressure of ammonia
-let x equal to the equilibrium partial pressure of ammonia

5.3E5 = x2/[(x/2)(3x/2)3]

the pre-equilibrium pressure of ammonia using this assumption is 2.24 E-6, which is far from the answer given which is 2.1E-3 ATM. what's the correct way to approach this type of problem?
Thanks in advance for any input.

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27664
  • Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Another partial pressure equilibrium problem
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2016, 05:37:30 AM »
Check your math.

BTW, it is not E-6. It is either 10-6 or E-6.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline docnet

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 46
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Re: Another partial pressure equilibrium problem
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2016, 10:02:22 AM »
thank you Borek!! (I got the right answer this time)

And also thanks for saying something about the E.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2016, 01:30:29 PM by docnet »

Offline docnet

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 46
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Re: Another partial pressure equilibrium problem
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2016, 03:41:24 AM »
My thing with the E6 started when I started writing in small and dense letters when solving equilibrium problems. On paper and in pen it makes the number that's being powered easier to visually distinguish when written as a superscript. I write so small that after a while all the E's and the numbers look the same to me. I always knew that E-6 means 10^-6 (which is the scientific notation)

A few times in class I read out loud from my calculator "E to the power of". Everyone including the teacher thought I was actually saying "2.718 to the power of..."  and that's when I knew I had a problem. ??? ::)

Offline docnet

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 46
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Re: Another partial pressure equilibrium problem
« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2016, 10:41:44 PM »
E-6 means 10^-6 (which is the scientific notation)

EDIT: The symbol ^ shouldn't be there. 

Sponsored Links