April 24, 2024, 10:27:50 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)  (Read 8583 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jones

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« on: October 07, 2017, 10:09:59 PM »
I've checked several of the answers on here but couldn't see something that satisfied me. I've been asked to draw the structural formula for the reactants and products of Glycine + Valine. After that, I had to label the functional groups and linkages present, as well as show the peptide bond.


R1 = H and R2 = CH, w/ two branches leading to two CH3
Carboxyl = COOH Amino = NH2
Amino Acid (1) = Glycine Amino Acid (2) = Valine Dipeptide = Gly-Ala

My question is, is this right and have I fully answered the question?

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5610
  • Mole Snacks: +321/-22
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2017, 09:34:30 AM »
Are there any other functional groups present?

Offline Jones

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2017, 07:26:19 PM »
If we were to look at the -OH then we can say that there is another functional group; hydroxyl.

That's all I can think of, do you see any other functional groups?

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5610
  • Mole Snacks: +321/-22
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2017, 08:27:50 AM »
Yes, but the -OH group is directly bonded to a carbonyl group (C=O), and when we put the two together we get a carboxylic acid.  There is one other functional group present, and it's on the opposite side of the molecule.

Offline Jones

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2017, 05:23:27 PM »
There's a carboxylic and an Amino group, but that's all I can think of/see. Am I missing something?

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5610
  • Mole Snacks: +321/-22
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2017, 07:33:57 PM »
Yes, the amino group is the other functional group that I was thinking of.

Offline Jones

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2017, 08:28:17 PM »
Does that mean that I have everything answered and accurate?
I just realized that Glycine and Valine both have the double bond on the Oxygen on the top-so should I switch them? Does it matter where the double bond on the oxygen is?
« Last Edit: October 09, 2017, 08:49:11 PM by Jones »

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5610
  • Mole Snacks: +321/-22
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2017, 09:09:17 AM »
In your answer you have Gly-Ala, which is not the same as what you drew.  In general there are several correct ways to draw a molecule.

Offline Jones

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2017, 01:28:05 PM »
If you look at the bottom you'll see that I have the functional groups listed, as well as what stands for R1 (H) and R2 (CH leading to two CH3). Would that make what I drew accurate? What's missing, or can I hand it in?

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5610
  • Mole Snacks: +321/-22
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2017, 07:18:42 PM »
I think that the way that you labeled the side-chains is fine.  I don't see any other problems.

Offline Jones

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2017, 08:06:45 PM »
Sorry, but just to make sure: would this structure would be ok, disregarding the fact that the peptide bond, and functional groups aren't labelled?


Offline hypervalent_iodine

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 261
  • Mole Snacks: +33/-1
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #11 on: October 11, 2017, 12:53:23 AM »
Seems to me you're still missing the functional group in the middle. Unless I'm missing something about the question or the answer you provided.

Offline Jones

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2017, 01:43:26 AM »
I thought that there were only two functional groups, and the peptide bond that joins them together? What functional group am I missing?

Offline hypervalent_iodine

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 261
  • Mole Snacks: +33/-1
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #13 on: October 11, 2017, 02:02:45 AM »
I thought that there were only two functional groups, and the peptide bond that joins them together? What functional group am I missing?

The functional group that the peptide forms a part of.

Offline Jones

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Biology/Chemistry (Check my answer, please?)
« Reply #14 on: October 11, 2017, 02:31:13 AM »
I'm not sure that that makes sense to me?

Sponsored Links