April 19, 2024, 04:38:30 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Why doesn't D block contraction affect other groups (14 15 etc.)  (Read 2217 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GKRM2727

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Why doesn't D block contraction affect other groups (14 15 etc.)
« on: November 12, 2017, 09:38:28 PM »
Usually we come across anomalies in the trends of periodic properties for example the size *[Atomic radius value from Raymond Chang Chemistry 9th Edition]* of Gallium (135 pm) is smaller than Aluminium (143 pm) as opposed to the basic trend that atomic size increases down the group. This is usually attributed to the fact that the poor shielding of nuclear charge by intervening D orbitals leads to a greater Z_{eff} hence the radius is less as opposed to the trend.

If that's the reason why don't we observe similar effects for other groups like group 15 having Phosphorus (110 pm) and Arsenic (120 pm)*[Here the size doesn't increase much but is still significant as compared to changes taking place in group 13]* , where the size actually increases even when there are D orbitals to intervene. Or in short why are the effects so profound for group 13 and not the other members?

There's another example of In(166 pm) and Tl (171 pm ). Both belong to group 13. As compared to other groups these two members have the lowest increase in atomic radius.


Sponsored Links