April 19, 2024, 10:30:32 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Reaction formula  (Read 2848 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline peterschmidt3943

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Reaction formula
« on: March 17, 2018, 05:58:44 PM »
Hello,

May I ask why in IO3‾  +  5 I‾  + 6 H+ ↔ 2 I2 +  3 H2O    there are 2 moles of I2 ? Actually, it has to be 5, but because of the index 2 it has to be 2,5  , isnt it ?


Kind regards

Offline Arkcon

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7367
  • Mole Snacks: +533/-147
Re: Reaction formula
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2018, 08:02:30 PM »
Hello,

May I ask why in IO3‾  +  5 I‾  + 6 H+ ↔ 2 I2 +  3 H2O 

This reaction isn't balanced.  Dunno where you got it, but its wrong.  Please don't tell me its what a teacher gave or what the textbook problem said, because its still wrong.  Take the initiative to balance it before wondering what else might possibly be wrong.

Quote
  there are 2 moles of I2 ?


Cause its wrong.

Quote
Actually, it has to be 5,

Also incorrect.

Quote
but because of the index 2 it has to be 2,5  , isnt it ?

Also incorrect.  Also, I don't know what you mean by index in this sense.  Also, although we sometimes use fractional numbers to make balancing easier, its not needed in this case.


Quote
Kind regards
Hey, I'm not judging.  I just like to shoot straight.  I'm a man of science.

Offline peterschmidt3943

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Reaction formula
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2018, 08:06:54 PM »
IO3‾  +   I‾  + 6 H+ ↔  I2 +  3 H2O
 

=> This is right, isnt it ?

Offline peterschmidt3943

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Reaction formula
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2018, 08:11:38 PM »
and yes, this is what a PROFESSOR wrote!!

Offline Arkcon

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7367
  • Mole Snacks: +533/-147
Re: Reaction formula
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2018, 08:32:43 PM »
IO3‾  +   I‾  + 6 H+ ↔  I2 +  3 H2O
 

=> This is right, isnt it ?

That's balanced, that doesn't mean the reaction happens that way
Hey, I'm not judging.  I just like to shoot straight.  I'm a man of science.

Offline peterschmidt3943

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Reaction formula
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2018, 08:34:12 PM »
why?

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27652
  • Mole Snacks: +1800/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Reaction formula
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2018, 04:49:33 AM »
IO3‾  +   I‾  + 6 H+ ↔  I2 +  3 H2O

Sorry, but that's not balanced either.

Your first equation was much closer to the reality, it contained just a single simple mistake.

Even then, just because the reaction is balanced doesn't mean it happens. Being balanced is a necessary, but not sufficient condition.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline peterschmidt3943

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Reaction formula
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2018, 06:22:43 AM »
IO3‾  +  5 I‾  + 6 H+ ↔ 2 I2 +  3 H2O,

=>so, on the right hand side it has to be three then, isnt it? I guess that because of the fact that we got 2,5, we have to round it up to 3... the equation would be balanced then..

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27652
  • Mole Snacks: +1800/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Reaction formula
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2018, 08:41:05 AM »
I guess that because of the fact that we got 2,5, we have to round it up to 3... the equation would be balanced then..

Pure nonsense. Do you understand what it means for the reaction to be balanced?
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline peterschmidt3943

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Reaction formula
« Reply #9 on: March 18, 2018, 09:48:44 AM »
yes, that and the fact that we got 6 I on the right and left side..

Offline Arkcon

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7367
  • Mole Snacks: +533/-147
Re: Reaction formula
« Reply #10 on: March 18, 2018, 01:21:01 PM »
peterschmidt3943: I've locked this thread, but you're free to post another one, but you'll have to do better at following this Forum's rules.

Its poor form to say "My teacher is a dummy and look at this..." or "My textbook is written by idiots because I know thermodynamics better than anyone ..." or things of that nature.

I specifically told you NOT to do that, in this thread, because I expected you to do that.

And you specifically did that, in this thread.

This thread is locked, before it becomes a multi page thread, with you posting nothing but "Why?"  or remaking posts that have already been corrected.

Write out all of your work and the reasons behind it in one posting.  Don't lengthen a thread with random posts:

"Is this it?"


"How 'bout now?"


Instead, build your answers using what's been posted.  When we ask a question, answer it, and then say how it helps you solve the problem, or "That doesn't help answer my question because what I see is ..."  and we'll all keep moving forward.
Hey, I'm not judging.  I just like to shoot straight.  I'm a man of science.

Sponsored Links