Any thoughts?
My initial thoughts are that the block of text you wrote is hard to follow. Also, your spreadsheet, which is nice to have so thank you for that, just casually mentions steps not mentioned in that black of text.
OK. You've been given a good assessment by
chenbeier:, you're 90-96% percent accurate. Question for you? Can you define 'accurate'? What is the textbook definition, and how does it apply to your work? Your instructor will likely expect this in your final report.
Did you perform multiple trails of the same sample? Do you get the same answer for multiple trials of the same sample? How much to repeated repetitions agree with each other? You accuracy can't be better than your precision. Can you define 'precision'? You will also be called upon to understand that concept, sooner or later.