April 24, 2024, 04:38:08 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: regioselectivity question  (Read 1700 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mana

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 189
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-3
regioselectivity question
« on: June 04, 2018, 03:42:01 AM »
Hi
In this reaction which product is dominant? I know steric effect should be considered, but both of them, I think has hindered substituents

Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3652
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
Re: regioselectivity question
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2018, 04:11:18 AM »
Perhaps also consider electronics?

Offline rolnor

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2212
  • Mole Snacks: +149/-10
Re: regioselectivity question
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2018, 05:31:27 AM »
I have lithiated fluoroaromatics and you can also get attack from one of the lithiated aromatics on the benzyne to get a biphenyl. I think the product in your scheme with the charge ortho to the methoxygroup is more stable.

Offline crawlingmcedge

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-0
Re: regioselectivity question
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2018, 02:54:31 PM »
Draw out the resonance structures for both products.

Consider the electronic nature of the OMe group? EWG? EDG? Which one would be the most stable?

Offline mana

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 189
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-3
Re: regioselectivity question
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2018, 04:18:24 AM »
Draw out the resonance structures for both products.

Consider the electronic nature of the OMe group? EWG? EDG? Which one would be the most stable?
Both seem terrible: -\ isn't it?
but the second is like a betaien

Sponsored Links