Chemical Forums
Chemistry Forums for Students => Organic Chemistry Forum => Topic started by: theanonymous on March 25, 2013, 06:10:54 PM
-
Question 5)
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FNUMBER5NEW_zps12b6ad32.png&hash=b5562c7fbf346fbcac31b82bae985f494867b38b)
From my notes in class, this is what I have:
On the first ester equivalent, the alpha proton is removed creating a nucleophilic carbon of the enolate ion. This nucleophilic alpha-carbon attacks the electrophilic carbonyl carbon of the second ester equivalent which throws up the pi bond into a lone pair on the oxide oxygen to form the tetrahedral which intermediate, then comes back down to "spit out" the alkoxide ion which quickly deprotonates the "carbonyl sandwiched" alpha proton. This leaves behind an enolate ion and the alcohol. The acid workup protons the enolate ion at carbon eventually. (May go through tautomerization.)
Species A:
This is wrong :(
I have one more submission left for species A.
Species B:
This is wrong too :(
-
Question 6)
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FHELPPLEASE_zps49ae87b1.png&hash=78d7f89ece95608a7557dff59f715431f3ea516f)
This is a similar problem
Question 9)
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FHELPPLEASE2_zps6909cd6e.png&hash=92d59c86f3b0668ce4721f005104dda1994c21da)
I completely messed up on this one
Question 11)
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FNUMBER11_zps9ac75c86.png&hash=99ef8d133dc811a8fc127ac742d348bee0e3891f)
This one looked similar to 6 and 5 but I STILL got it wrong :'(
-
??? ???
-
questions 5, and 9 are Claisen condensations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claisen_condensation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claisen_condensation)
question 11 is an aldol condensation.
question 6 we have done already and has nothing to do with the other reactions.
-
questions 5, and 9 are Claisen condensations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claisen_condensation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claisen_condensation)
question 11 is an aldol condensation.
question 6 we have done already and has nothing to do with the other reactions.
For 5, is species A this then?
-
No that is not species A. The proton alpha to the carbonyl of one ester attacks the carbonyl of the other ester.
-
No that is not species A. The proton alpha to the carbonyl of one ester attacks the carbonyl of the other ester.
Is the answer ?
-
That is correct.
-
That is correct.
:D!!!!!!!
-
That is correct.
Oh no :(
It says it's wrong...
-
Well the condensation of two equivalents of this ester should give
I suppose you could also get this
as the middle hydrogen of the first product is then the most acidic one.
-
Well the condensation of two equivalents of this ester should give
Idk :(
I've used 3/3 submissions for that one...
So I suppose species B isn't ?
-
Sorry I added a bit to my last post.
I think B could be ethoxide.
-
Sorry I added a bit to my last post.
I think B could be ethoxide.
Species B isn't ethoxide :(
I hate Webassign...
3/3 submissions used for species B...
No hope for the last one.
I have to wait until tomorrow morning at 9:45 AM to see the answers/if your answers were close :(
What about number 6? You said that it's not like the other reactions?
-
Sorry I was referring to one of your previous posts. The images are a bit small on my screen and with my eyesight!
Let me think about number 6.
-
So which ester undergoes a Claisen condensation? And why?
-
Sorry I was referring to one of your previous posts. The images are a bit small on my screen and with my eyesight!
Let me think about number 6.
Ok!
-
So which ester undergoes a Claisen condensation? And why?
The first one because on the left, there are 2 alpha H protons that can be attacked by a base to make that carbon nucleophilic, which will then be able to attack the second equivalent of the ester.
-
I think it is the first one. The reason the second one doesn't react is probably steric congestion. The anion of the second one is on a tertiary carbon, and to react it must produce a sterically crowded quaternary carbon. This is certainly not likely.
-
I think it is the first one. The reason the second one doesn't react is probably steric congestion. The anion of the second one is on a tertiary carbon, and to react it must produce a sterically crowded quaternary carbon. This is certainly not likely.
Sooo...for part A, i do the Claisen reaction for the first ester?
-
Yes. :o
-
Yes. :o
I submitted this... :(:(:( 1/3 submissions...and it's wrong...
aklbfsajksdfkljdfsjkn
I don't even know what to say.
-
That's what I would say is correct.
-
That's what I would say is correct.
They marked it as wrong though :(
???
-
Now I am at a loss as to what they want here.
These questions are somewhat misleading as to the reagents used. The acid work up should just protonate everything. I wonder if the acid work up is also hydrolysing the ester in the product to give the acid which then decarboxylates???? Meaning that
is the product they want?
-
Now I am at a loss as to what they want here.
These questions are somewhat misleading as to the reagents used. The acid work up should just protonate everything. I wonder if the acid work up is also hydrolysing the ester in the product to give the acid which then decarboxylates???? Meaning that
is the product they want?
:(:(
I'll try it. But I have no idea what they want either...
I mean if you can't figure it out then my class's average for this HW assignment is gonna be really really low :(
Because I doubt anyone else in my class can figure this out on their own.
-
I can figure it out but as I said the questions are misleading and finding out exactly what they want is the hard part.
As I wasn't in your class I can't really comment on the material you were given.
I'm sorry I don't seem to be much use tonight :'(
-
Wait...I found this in my teachers lecture notes
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FANSWER-1_zps89cfbdbe.png&hash=48ea48254e5de42e0fdd9b3e3630ad07e2f62f08)
Is that what we have to do?
-
Also, I found this on Yahoo Answers...it's very similar to the one I'm given..
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090414141221AAsklSv
What does C6H5-O-C(=O)-CH(CH3)-C(=O)C2H5 look like?
-
You mean they want the enolate as the product?
This is also in equilibrium with the keto form and the other enolate.
-
You mean they want the enolate as the product?
This is also in equilibrium with the keto form and the other enolate.
Oh...so are you saying it wouldn't make a difference? :(
-
Google Keto-enol tautomerisation.
-
Google Keto-enol tautomerisation.
Ohh...:(
-
Ohh...:(
So they are essentially the same...
Today's been a long day...
these organic chemistry questions are really discouraging.
Ok well...moving on from this question I guess.
Do you know the answer to question 9?
-
Yes, I know the answer!
-
Yes, I know the answer!
Awesome! :o
That one is correct!
Thanks!!!
What about Number 11...did I get it right this time?
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FNUMBER11NEW_zpsd6fbe025.png&hash=24eeb80dd7829e113ad2eabef5a6735efa1c3e1f)
-
No your answer is wrong. This is an aldol condensation.
See if you can work it out otherwise I will draw a scheme.
-
No your answer is wrong. This is an aldol condensation.
See if you can work it out otherwise I will draw a scheme.
Oh no :(
I've done it twice..
-
No your answer is wrong. This is an aldol condensation.
See if you can work it out otherwise I will draw a scheme.
Oh no :(
I've done it twice..
Can you show me?
-
Look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldol_condensation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldol_condensation)
In the meantime I will draw a scheme
-
Here is my scheme:
-
Here is my scheme:
Awesome!!
That structure is correct :D
Thanks!!!
-
Ok I have oooone last question...This one is a bit of a doozy.
I have no idea what the answer is but...lemme upload it real quick
-
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FCRAZYQUESTION_zps9d0560ae.png&hash=a73ff6a77d21d78f809ff46bb6649273816a3584)
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FCRAZYQUESTION2_zps14bb524c.png&hash=2b9c7ff3a1e212017cca564582944de5d3ebe038)
-
Isn't the answer just one of these?
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fchemistry.umeche.maine.edu%2FCHY431%2FBasics%2FCyto-Taut.gif&hash=66f20aa04de76b90ee489518044c478c90542e9d)
-
Oh i got it right!
Thanks again discodermolide!! For putting up with me and these wretched problems xD
Ill try to figure out #5 and 6 tomorrow morning before 9:45 AM..if not, oh well.
I'm gonna head out..night!
-
That's OK.
Here is my answer to the tautomer question.
-
I got 5 (Species C at least) and 6 right just in the nick of time!
The structures were right - but what I forgot to do was deuterate the Hydrogen by the methyl group for both of them...
The structure I got for Species A was actually supposed to be Species C.
And it looks like this:
Question 5)
Species A:
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FSPECIES_A_zps1d573396.png&hash=d8b6af7a822f7fdb855558ff91439b106e1f4b1a)
Species B:
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FSPECIES_B_zps6a1e3998.png&hash=80affc5ebbf3dac40511514a3d39979ff4647764)
Species C:
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FSPECIES_C_zps4d600e6e.png&hash=8d05e911c329ba20fe0cf99dce744eaaabb4e83e)
Question 6)
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi11.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa179%2Fslourg%2FNUMBER_6ANSWER_zps5850464a.png&hash=d229d01564446f98de0a4d5a9bee10db02e89a49)
:D!
I feel like I'm slowly getting better at Organic Chem :P
-
Glad you got it sorted. I must admit I forgot about the deuterium!