May 20, 2024, 06:05:55 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
What are your thoughts?

Going from Neon to Lithium, the atomic radius increases sharply because you introduce a electron shell. Previously the effect of shielding on Neon acted to the maximum effect, when you add a new shell, there's a new shell to act the shielding effect on, so you have two factors going from Neon to Lithium that explain that has the highest atomic radius within that period of Lithium. In subsueqent increases of atomic number starting from lithium, you increase nuclear charge which drops the atomic radius, the shielding factor remains constant across a period because the inner shell doesn't change, and I have no idea how to explain azimuthal effect (adding the p-orbital) yet the green dots have a lower absolute value slope than that of the purple dots when talking about iso-lithium period.

2


Because of the octest rule?

Guess: The only factors at play here are the nuclear charge which without slater's rules we only use a Z_eff estimate play a constant rate increasing effect going across the column left to right.

If the atomic radius isn't dropping as heavily as atomic number increases across a period, the only possibility is the shielding is increasing across the period. But that's a contradiction because you inner shell isn't changing across the same period.
3
What are your thoughts?
4


 Why is the slope in order of smallest to 1. largest main group (1-2), 2. transition metals, 3. main groups 13-18?
5
The forum rules require that you give us your own thoughts before you can receive help.

And, honestly, you never even acknowledge responses to your other questions, so motivation to continue providing assistance is low.
6






gp1/2 ionic radius sharper drop


With the exception of phosphide, the difference in ionic radius between successive anion forming non-metals is smaller than that between group I and group II's cations

What explains this slope ( atomic radius to atomic number) besides the Bohr radius trend for isoelectronic to hydrogen elements is applicable to just about all atoms in the main group?

Why is the Bohr radius (slope versus atomic number) trend in the figure below consistent for atoms non-isoelectronic to Hydrogen?


Why is the following true besides it is consistent with Slater's rules? "Lithium has but 3 protons in its nucleus. Adding a fourth, to make it beryllium, increases the nuclear charge by 33%. But if you add yet another proton, to make it boron, you are increasing the nuclear charge by 25%. And so on, down to the change from oxygen to fluorine, an increase in the nuclear charge (really, the proton count) of only 12.5%. This accounts for the decline in rate of change that you observ
7
Organic Chemistry Forum / Re: Cahn-Ingold-Prelog ACS Question on YouTube
« Last post by benz0icacid on May 18, 2024, 03:44:04 PM »
I agree. Also, it doesn't make sense for it to be 2R, 3S and it's cis. It would be 2R, 3R, if I'm not mistaken.
Thanks!
edit: exactly, @Hunter2. Thank you!
8
Organic Chemistry Forum / Re: Cahn-Ingold-Prelog ACS Question on YouTube
« Last post by Hunter2 on May 18, 2024, 03:43:44 PM »
It should be the cis - 4-bromo-2R,3R epoxy- butan-1-ol.
9
Organic Chemistry Forum / Re: Cahn-Ingold-Prelog ACS Question on YouTube
« Last post by Babcock_Hall on May 18, 2024, 03:07:26 PM »
The video looks incorrect to me.
10
Hello!
I'm watching an ACS Ochem 2 Exam Review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQctLH-psYc&list=PL3A1cf8LCsnlSRO3HEygntDa4cd9tQh2U&index=1

At timestamp 4:30, we are assigning R and S configuration for the epoxide's carbon #3. We are comparing the carbon with O, C, H, and the carbon connected to Br, H, H. The carbon connected to OCH is given 2nd priority, and the carbon with BHH is given 3rd priority. Why is that? I thought since Br has the higher mass, it would have 2nd priority?

I also found a similar question on R/MCAT: https://www.reddit.com/r/Mcat/comments/91mzf1/br_or_oh_higher_priority/

I would appreciate the clarification. Thank you for your time and patience!
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10