Chemical Forums
Chemistry Forums for Students => Undergraduate General Chemistry Forum => Topic started by: nj_bartel on July 30, 2009, 08:32:20 PM
-
For example, if you have a flame that burns pretty low, say 200 oC and you have a heat source that heats to 200 oC, is that flame going to be able to accomplish something that that heat source cannot? Why?
-
Maybe add CO2?
The fuel will break down to CO2 and H2O.
The CO2 might eventually deposit carbon on a surface.
A flame is more direct than an electric plate.
Also, I wouldn't use electric heat for a test tube.
-
Initiation of radical reactions.
But if you mean for heating a flask, they are the same.
-
Got it, thanks. Didn't realize fire involved radical formation :)
-
Didn't realize fire involved radical formation
It does and that explains why powder and halon fire extinguishers are so efficient; they are radical scavengers and stop the fire chemistry rather than just removing oxygen.
-
It is possible to have a flame at 200C?
-
Didn't realize fire involved radical formation
It does and that explains why powder and halon fire extinguishers are so efficient; they are radical scavengers and stop the fire chemistry rather than just removing oxygen.
Cool stuff, love real world apps :P
I believe naptha burns somewhere around there