May 19, 2024, 02:01:12 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: 1H NMR chemical shifts in reverse order regarding to inductive effects  (Read 3048 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sylvain33400

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Hi everyone,

I prepared some halogenated compounds of the general formula XH2C-CO-NHR and X2HC-CO-NHR.
For the mono-halogenated derivatives, the chemical shifts of the proton and the 13C follow the "rule" of the inductive effect of the halogen : d(FH2C) > d(ClH2C) > d(BrH2C) > d (IH2C), i.e. the more electronegative the halogen is, the higher the chemical shifts.
But for the di-halogenated derivatives, I get the reverse order for the chemical shifts of the proton (d(F2HC) < d(Cl2HC) < d(Br2HC) < d (I2HC)) while the chemical shifts of the 13C are in the "right" order.
Any explanations for that ?
Thanks.

Offline Smrt guy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 101
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-4
Re: 1H NMR chemical shifts in reverse order regarding to inductive effects
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2010, 10:03:10 PM »
This is something I have observed but do not fully understand myself.  This is what I've pieced together.  Chemical shifts are based on relative shielding/deshielding effects of the neighboring atoms.  Inductively withdrawing groups such as halides pull electron density away from nearby atoms thereby having a deshielding effect.  However, sometimes I have found that when a lot of strongly electron withdrawing groups with a lot of electrons are attached the reverse effect is seen.  I attribute this to the electrons on those withdrawing groups effectively shielding the atoms in question despite the polarization of the bonds.  Case in point, in 31P NMR, phosphites, P(OR)3, are found around ~150-170 ppm and phosphates, O=P(OR)3 are close to 0 (relatively shielded).  Again, this is a rationalization based on an observation rather than understanding.  Hope this helps.

Sponsored Links