May 08, 2024, 08:22:01 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Solving for half-life  (Read 1112 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Timeless Thinker

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Solving for half-life
« on: May 01, 2020, 04:31:16 AM »
Radiochemists studied copper-61 and found that 7.85×10–5mol emitted 1.47 × 1019 positrons in 90.0 minutes. What is the half-life (in hours) for copper-61?

7.85x10-5-(1.47×1019/6.02x1023) = 7.85x10-5 x (1/2)t/HL

5.41x10-5=7.85x10-5 x (1/2)90/HL

.689=(1/2)90/HL

log(.689)=90/HL x log(1/2)

.537 = 90/HL

HL= 167.6 minutes

Is this the correct approach?

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27680
  • Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Solving for half-life
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2020, 09:53:08 AM »
Logic looks OK at first sight.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5618
  • Mole Snacks: +323/-23
Re: Solving for half-life
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2020, 09:59:37 AM »
I don't understand why you used 1/2 as the base.  Why don't you write out the rate law for radioactive decay?

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27680
  • Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Solving for half-life
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2020, 10:44:34 AM »
[itex]\left(\frac 1 2\right)^{\frac t {T_{\frac 1 2}}}[/itex] is just a direct application of the half time definition, isn't it?
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline mjc123

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2054
  • Mole Snacks: +296/-12
Re: Solving for half-life
« Reply #4 on: May 01, 2020, 11:24:25 AM »
To be pedantic, the question asks for the half life in hours.
Be careful about things like this, it could lose you unnecessary marks in an exam.

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5618
  • Mole Snacks: +323/-23
Re: Solving for half-life
« Reply #5 on: May 01, 2020, 11:46:33 AM »
I worked the problem differently and obtained a half-life of 167.4 minutes = 2.790 hours.  This is slightly less than what I have found in quick, on-line searches (3.33 hours).  The slight difference between this problem and what I found on-line might be because of the limited amount of data in the present problem.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2020, 12:23:30 PM by Babcock_Hall »

Offline AWK

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7979
  • Mole Snacks: +555/-93
  • Gender: Male
Re: Solving for half-life
« Reply #6 on: May 01, 2020, 12:02:47 PM »
Problem with this data is solved to decay constant (problem #2, finally gives the same half-time)
https://www.chemteam.info/Kinetics/WS-Kinetics-first-order-radioactive-decay.html
AWK

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5618
  • Mole Snacks: +323/-23
Re: Solving for half-life
« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2020, 12:23:02 PM »
AWK,

The solution at the link which you provided also how I solved it.  The equation given by the OP was unfamiliar to me, which threw me off-track at first.  Thanks.

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27680
  • Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Solving for half-life
« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2020, 05:33:20 PM »
It helps to write what OP did in symbols, not in numbers. Then it is obvious it is a direct application of the half life definition.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Sponsored Links