Chemical Forums

Chemistry Forums for Students => Organic Chemistry Forum => Topic started by: tangent1.57 on August 08, 2009, 10:59:21 PM

Title: Why are C-C double bonds electrophilic?
Post by: tangent1.57 on August 08, 2009, 10:59:21 PM
Why are double-bonds electrophilic when, in fact, there are a lot of electrons in that area?  C=C should be electro-phobic!
Title: Re: Why are C-C double bonds electrophilic?
Post by: nj_bartel on August 09, 2009, 02:37:15 AM
They generally behave as nucleophiles.
Title: Re: Why are C-C double bonds electrophilic?
Post by: orgoclear on August 09, 2009, 02:47:17 AM
C=C bonds undergo ELECTROPHILIC ADDITION reactions because there is a pie-electron cloud surrounding the sigma bonded C-C. This makes the attack of an electrophile easier. Further as the C-atoms are sp2 hybridised, so, their electronegativity increases compared to sp3. Hence they behave as nucleophiles
Title: Re: Why are C-C double bonds electrophilic?
Post by: ufalynn88 on August 10, 2009, 12:11:17 AM
if you draw the resonance structure of C=C, you get C+-C- (ie one C with a positive charge and the other negative)..obviously the atoms would rarely exist like this for any amounts of time...however this still shows the nucleophilic nature of the carbon....
Title: Re: Why are C-C double bonds electrophilic?
Post by: chalconix on August 15, 2009, 04:14:29 PM
C=C bonds undergo ELECTROPHILIC ADDITION reactions because there is a pie-electron cloud surrounding the sigma bonded C-C. This makes the attack of an electrophile easier. Further as the C-atoms are sp2 hybridised, so, their electronegativity increases compared to sp3. Hence they behave as nucleophiles
in fact there is an empty π* (LUMO) which is easily filled and the π-bond is breaking.
Title: Re: Why are C-C double bonds electrophilic?
Post by: luiee on November 29, 2009, 11:03:27 AM
there is an empty pie* (LUMO),not n*  , easily filled and the pie-bond is breaking
Title: Re: Why are C-C double bonds electrophilic?
Post by: luiee on November 29, 2009, 11:04:43 AM
MAYBE there is an empty pie* (LUMO),not n*  , easily filled and the pie-bond is breaking