May 17, 2024, 10:10:14 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Moles  (Read 3688 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Zohaib

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Moles
« on: February 24, 2007, 03:12:18 PM »
What does one mole of a substance represent on a microscopic, atomic basis? What does one mole of a substance represent on a macroscopic. mass basis?

6.02 x 10^23, is that the answer, wouldn't their be two answers?

Offline Yggdrasil

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3215
  • Mole Snacks: +485/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Physical Biochemist
Re: Moles
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2007, 03:15:16 PM »
Probably for the microscopic basis, 6.02x1023 particles is a good answer.  However, for the macroscopic basis, think about what the mass of a mole of a particular substance will be.

Offline Zohaib

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Moles
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2007, 03:17:20 PM »
so the answer would be 6.02 x 10^23 and then the other one would just be the mass of any given element? Wait. so i'd to avogadros number times the mass of any element?
« Last Edit: February 24, 2007, 03:44:31 PM by Zohaib »

Offline Yggdrasil

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3215
  • Mole Snacks: +485/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Physical Biochemist
Re: Moles
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2007, 04:20:48 PM »
Basically Avogadro's number is the conversion factor from atomic mass units (daltons) to grams:  6.02x1023 amu = 1g.  Therefore, if you have a mole of oxygen atoms each weighing 16 amu each, the mass will be (6.02x1023 x 16) amu.  If you apply the conversion factor, you get:

(6.02x1023 x 16) amu x (1 g/6.02x1023 amu) = 16 g

This is why the mass in grams of a mole of a particular element is equal to that element's atomic weight.

Sponsored Links