May 26, 2024, 10:54:21 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Suzuki reaction and silyl protection  (Read 4737 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline arom58

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Suzuki reaction and silyl protection
« on: March 28, 2009, 12:46:24 AM »
I've been trying to carry a Suzuki rxn out on an aryl bromide and a tbutyldiphenylsilyl- protected phenyl boronic acid but I have read ( Tetrahedron Utters, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 187-190, 1997) that the protecting group would not survive alkalinity of the reaction. The protection on phenolic OH is absolutely necessary and it must also get deprotected afer the Suzuki coupling easily. TBDPS and TOM look auspicious for the deprotection step but I first need to get away with their base sensitivity.

Offline gfunk

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • Gender: Male
Re: Suzuki reaction and silyl protection
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2009, 06:35:18 PM »
I remember reading how TBDPS was quite stable in acidic conditions (about 5 million times that of TMS), but never looked into its alkaline stability.  If you get a protecting groups book (like Kocienski's) it'll give you the relative stabilities of the silyl ether protecting groups in acidic and alkaline conditions.  If I remember correctly, TIPS (triisopropyl silyl-) is one of the more stable silyl protecting groups in alkaline conditions.

I left my Kocienski book in my lab, but the Wikipedia article replicates the exact same format as the book.  In fact, I'm sure it's a shameless ripping:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silyl_ether

Quote
In acidic media, the relative stability is:

    TMS (1) < TES (64) < TBS (20 000) < TIPS (700 000) < TBDPS (5 000 000)

In basic media, the relative stability is:

    TMS (1) < TES (10-100) < TBS~TBDPS (20 000) < TIPS (100 000)
Grad Student - Organic Chemistry
University of Alberta

Offline arom58

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: Suzuki reaction and silyl protection
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2009, 12:46:33 AM »
Thank you very much buddy. It's been very helpful ;D

Offline gfunk

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • Gender: Male
Re: Suzuki reaction and silyl protection
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2009, 03:26:39 AM »
No problem, hope it helped! :-)
Grad Student - Organic Chemistry
University of Alberta

Sponsored Links