Chemical Forums

Chemistry Forums for Students => Undergraduate General Chemistry Forum => Topic started by: Win,odd Dhamnekar on January 11, 2021, 09:21:11 AM

Title: Equilibrium concentration of [tex]Zn^{2+}[/tex] in [tex][ZnCN_4^{2-}][/tex]
Post by: Win,odd Dhamnekar on January 11, 2021, 09:21:11 AM
Calculate the equilibrium concentration of Zn2+  in a Zn(CN)42-

My Answer:-
 Zn2+(aq)+ 4CN (aq) :rarrow: ZnCN42-(aq) ;  Kf =1×1018

Let x be the change in concentration as Zn2+ dissociates. Because the initial Zn2+ concentration is 0, the concentration at any times is x:

                 [tex]1.0\times10^{18}=\frac{[Zn(CN)_4]^{2-}}{[Zn^{2+}][CN^-]^4}=\frac{0.30-x}{x(4x)^4}[/tex]

[tex]1\times 10^{18}*(256x^5)=0.30- x[/tex]

Since x is very small in comparison to 0.30 M, drop x:
  Solving this equation, we get x=6.51 × 10-5 M

 Is this answer correct?



Title: Re: Equilibrium concentration of [tex]Zn^{2+}[/tex] in [tex]ZnCN_4^{2-}[/tex]
Post by: mjc123 on January 11, 2021, 11:02:36 AM
Yes, but take care with some matters of presentation. Write the concentration of the complex as [Zn(CN)42-]. (I know we sometimes use square brackets in writing complexes, but this is a fairly simple one, and it's important to distinguish charges from exponents.) Also, there is no such species as "4CN". You should write [CN-] (don't forget the minus charge). [CN-] = 4x. We have discussed this before. Do you understand what the numbers mean in an equation?
Title: Re: Equilibrium concentration of [tex]Zn^{2+}[/tex] in [tex][ZnCN_4^{2-}][/tex]
Post by: Win,odd Dhamnekar on January 11, 2021, 11:49:42 AM
As per your reply, i made the necessary changes in my answer. I think it now comply with the rules for the presentation in chemistry.
Title: Re: Equilibrium concentration of [tex]Zn^{2+}[/tex] in [tex][ZnCN_4^{2-}][/tex]
Post by: mjc123 on January 12, 2021, 05:03:57 AM
There's another point that occurs to me. You say "Since x is very small in comparison to 0.30, drop x". It's a good idea to check such an assumption at the end of your calculation. You could simply add a line:
"6.51 x 105 << 0.30, therefore the assumption was valid."
It does no harm to write this explicitly in your answer; even if you don't, it's good to get into the habit of making that check in your own mind whenever you use such an assumption.