Chemical Forums
Chemistry Forums for Students => Organic Chemistry Forum => Topic started by: 2810713 on March 07, 2005, 07:52:47 AM
-
Hi, :)
Consider the following reaction-
RCO-OH + H-OR'
----------> RCOOR' + H-OH
In the above reaction an acid reacts with a base to form salt[ ester] and water, thus it appears to be a nutralization reaction.
But here, the OH- of water is given by acid[!] and the H+ by the base !!! Now, can we call this a nutralization reaction ?
One of my friends says that as there is no specification about the donor of H+ & OH- in the definition of a nutralization reaction , we should call this as a nutralization reaction!
But, in my opinion , the mechanism of this reaction is also important! As the mechanism of esterification deffers from
that of nutralization reactions, their characteristics differ and thus we can't classify them in a single group.
One of my friends had a notion that here, ROH acts as an acid and RCOOH as a base.But how can they suddenly change their roles? Please help...
thanx
hrushikesh
-
neutralisation specifically refer to:
H+ + OH- -> H2O
other form of acid-base reactions are just called lewis/bronsted acid-base reactions.
you should examine the mechanism of esterification before deciding if it's actually an acid-base reaction. Please refer to http://www.chemguide.co.uk/physical/catalysis/esterify.html for more information.
-
Also note that the typical reaction conditions for this type of esterification (called a Fisher Esterification) include at least a catalytic amount of a strong acid (e.g. sulfuric acid). There is never an appreciable amount of OH- in solution.
-
Thanks for the responses.Thnx for the link, it was really good!
:)
But, if nutralization is simply the formation of HOH then should we call this as nutralization or redefine nutralization?
Hmmm...
hrushikesh