Chemical Forums

Chemistry Forums for Students => High School Chemistry Forum => Topic started by: gracie7 on December 18, 2009, 11:33:26 AM

Title: Why is the atomic weight of oxygen less than 16 when its isotopes are 16,17,18?
Post by: gracie7 on December 18, 2009, 11:33:26 AM
I cannot figure out why the atomic wt. for oxygen is less than 16 (i.e., 15.999), when its three main, stable isotopes have weights of 16, 17, and 18. Can anyone please explain this to me?
Title: Re: Why is the atomic weight of oxygen less than 16 when its isotopes are 16,17,18?
Post by: JGK on December 18, 2009, 12:09:19 PM
Naturally occurring oxygen is composed of three stable isotopes, 16O, 17O, and 18O, with 16O being the most abundant (99.762% natural abundance).

I would say it's due to rounding up of the actual weights rather than reporting to a load of decimal places for each isotope.
Title: Re: Why is the atomic weight of oxygen less than 16 when its isotopes are 16,17,18?
Post by: Borek on December 18, 2009, 12:13:32 PM
What is EXACT mass of 16O?

Hint: it is not 16.
Title: Re: Why is the atomic weight of oxygen less than 16 when its isotopes are 16,17,18?
Post by: AWK on December 18, 2009, 01:44:19 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_oxygen