Chemical Forums

Chemistry Forums for Students => Organic Chemistry Forum => Topic started by: Dan on December 27, 2014, 08:24:38 AM

Title: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Dan on December 27, 2014, 08:24:38 AM
Here is this week's target, rules can be found here (http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=77867.msg284036#msg284036).
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: kriggy on December 27, 2014, 03:43:19 PM
Haha ok lets hit it :)
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F4poywAV.png&hash=e7fd845e310fcd2b57eddad8aba1b2b08e1a2f90)
Hope I didnt forget something obviously important :D
Im not realy sure about the acetal I saw it somewhere that it protects the keton I want and not the conjugated one. The 2nd thing is that Im not sure if NaOH is strong enough to deprotonate the nitrohexane. But another base could be used. The pyrrolidine formation should proceed easily as the nitro group is reduced to amino since its intermolecular reaction. Shiff base is reduced by the hydrogen present in the reaction  mixture.
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Altered State on December 29, 2014, 06:29:33 AM
Haha ok lets hit it :)
http://i.imgur.com/4poywAV.png

May I suggest another initial route?
It seems kind of strange to me using those starting materials :P

(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FN0vbwNs.jpg&hash=18ee3526ff577264a03e715c50f6e517828869b3)

In this case you don't have to worry about the selectivity of the protection anymore, a few less steps (I think?) and less redox reactions (I like routes with less redox steps possible)


I cannot be sure about stereochemistry tho
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: kriggy on December 29, 2014, 07:00:49 AM
Yea it was strange but thats why we are here :)
Damn those lithium compounds, I always forget that they exist :D
THe thing is that I saw synthesis of very similar compound in "Disconection approach" few days ago so I didnt want to just copy their synthesis since that would be useless for me to learn something (but I still used the nitro->amino-> reductive amination pathway which I realy like)
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Altered State on December 29, 2014, 08:14:23 AM
Yea it was strange but thats why we are here :)

True that. Even though there are better or worse methods, what is amazing of organic synthesis is the many approaches one can take!

(but I still used the nitro->amino-> reductive amination pathway which I realy like)

I like it very much too. I would like to know about the yields of those cyclations
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: kriggy on December 29, 2014, 10:38:58 AM

I like it very much too. I would like to know about the yields of those cyclations
You can find more on page 58 of "disconection approach" or in articles they quote:
R.V.Stevens, A.W.M. Lee, J.Chem.Soc., Chem. Commun., 1982,102
R.V.Stevens, Acc. CHem.Res., 1984, 17, 289

I didnt read those articles but disconection approach says 68 for the second cyclizaton but the compound is bit different (one ring is 6 membered and the alkyl chain is shorter)
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: critzz on December 29, 2014, 10:49:37 AM
Okay, here is my try. Stereochemistry is not one of my strengths though.  :(

(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi59.tinypic.com%2Fmikj2u.gif&hash=f44e5f1bef768e2ef559b210dd1934a644381836)
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: kriggy on December 29, 2014, 11:33:43 AM
Very nice, is there any particular reason to oxidize the OH before you remove the benzyl protecting goup? YOu could remove it 1st and the do the oxidation and you wouldnt have to protect the ketone
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: critzz on December 29, 2014, 12:18:12 PM
Well, you could be right. I just don't really know what happens to a primary amine under oxidizing conditions.
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Dan on December 29, 2014, 12:53:27 PM
Nice route critzz, I like the Paal-Knorr approach and have been thinking about that too, but I can't get the right diastereoisomer.

Can you comment on the diastereoselectivity (facial selectivity) of the hydrogenation? I would expect addition of hydrogen predominantly from the least hindered face, which would give the wrong diastereoisomer (see blow). I might be totally wrong though.
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: critzz on December 29, 2014, 03:51:08 PM
Haha, I mixed up the kinetic and thermodynamically favored product.
I guess both diastereomers are formed, rendering this synthesis useless (at least I tried).

However, I might have found something interesting about these pyrrole reductions?

http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/single/articleFullText.htm?publicId=1860-5397-4-3

Especially scheme 7, 9 and the end conclusion.
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: kriggy on December 29, 2014, 04:21:57 PM
Well that makes this rather easy doesnt it?
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: phth on December 30, 2014, 08:58:38 PM
I think that this is another good way to install the stereochemistry of the bridgehead CH, but gotta sepereate enantiomers in the first step which could be more stereoselective by doing the addition using a mono substutited alkene instead of ethylene
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Altered State on December 31, 2014, 05:00:06 AM
@phth
Great job. Liked it.
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: kriggy on December 31, 2014, 06:06:09 AM
How do you stop the ketene / ethene reacting with itself?
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: phth on December 31, 2014, 06:53:19 AM
I think its because it has to be a LUMO-LUMO orbital interaction so photons activate it.  The first step is interesting if instead of a hexyl group it is a functionality that can be modified later like a protected alcohol.  So the first reactions enantiomers are separated, and the cyclization is carried out until the amide is formed.  Now we install either methyl or hexyl to the amide and modify the alcohol functional group to resemble the same enantiomer as the final product. That is how I think the all of the pdt from the first reaciton can be used to generate a single enantiomer
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: SinkingTako on January 01, 2015, 12:37:49 AM
phth, great job! I really like your synthesis :)

Also, can anyone recommend a good book on learning strerochemical control?
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: phth on January 01, 2015, 11:16:45 PM
This is the best book IMHO:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0199270295/organischeche-20#customerReviews
http://www.organic-chemistry.org/books/reviews/0198503466.shtm
But here is a great resource with editorial reviews including books of all difficulties:
http://www.organic-chemistry.org/books/navi/organicchemistry.shtm
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Dan on January 02, 2015, 07:28:41 AM
Nice creative route phth. Two comments:

1. You seem to have gained a C in the rearrangement. I think you need an extra methylene in the starting material - so you go via a [4.2.0] bicyclic aminal.

2. Can you propose a synthesis of the starting material (so that the route starts from commercially available material)?
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: phth on January 02, 2015, 09:22:00 PM
Also, I like because it Gst. material-Gend product is a good ratio to work with when its as high as possible to begin with.  The Schmidt, Curtius reaction are nitrenes, and synonymous with carbene reactions.  Carbenoid Rh2(OAc)4 may work with this also, but im not sure about cross metathesis.  Stepwise react with acyl chloride -78C to 0C, and heating more than this generates the ketene or another reaction like CH insertion.
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FtKM9Uhb.png&hash=ed0a571788243492fbf040a93760d5cb56a84e64)
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: SinkingTako on January 03, 2015, 09:03:37 AM
This week there is a tie. Both critzz and phth have 8 steps (kriggy comes very close!).

Who's winner? let's get OP to decide! :)
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: critzz on January 03, 2015, 11:17:08 AM
I always like to see those electrocyclic reactions in total syntheses, but I lack the ability to come up with those reaction paths myself.
What does a typical electrocyclic reaction procedure with hν look like (reaction conditions etc.)?
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: kriggy on January 03, 2015, 12:16:30 PM
This week there is a tie. Both critzz and phth have 8 steps (kriggy comes very close!).

Who's winner? let's get OP to decide! :)

Its not ONLY about number of steps. Having more steps that are reliable is better than fewer but unreliable IMO.
I realy like phth´s pathway. Its very creative
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Altered State on January 03, 2015, 01:19:24 PM
Ketenes can also be prepared from the corresponding acyl chloride, treating it with a base. An amine is enough, I believe.
I liked phth pathway too.
Looking forward to see what is the next challenge. I hope I have time to go for a route this time, I'm really busy these days, and Christmas celebrations don't help :P
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Dan on January 04, 2015, 09:25:28 AM
Apologies for not looking into this thread to often, I've been on holiday.

I am inclined to go with phth's proposal as the winning entry. I like the creativity of the approach. I would like to see a synthesis of the proposed starting chiral acid chloride though...

I will share with you my own suggestion. I spent some time trying to come up with a chiral pool synthesis from pyrogluctamic acid, but failed to find something good. Eventually I settled on this as the shortest route. It is an enantioselective synthesis using Noyori asymmetric hydrogenation for stereocontrol. Not very inventive, but it is short.

1. Double addition of of lithiated hexyne to succinic anhydride at low temp (diketone obtained on aqueous workup)
2. Lindlar reduction  [Edit: Alkenes formed in this step should be Z, not E]
3. Double Noyori reduction (the chirality sense at both asymmetric centres is the same)
4. Double tosylation
5. Double SN2 displacement by the chiral allylic amine (itself prepared in 3 steps from 3-octen-2-one via Noyori chemistry).
6. Grubbs metathesis
7. Alkene hydrogenation

Longest linear sequence is 7 steps.
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: orgopete on January 04, 2015, 09:51:48 AM

1. Double addition of of lithiated hexyne to succinic anhydride at low temp (diketone obtained on aqueous workup)
2. Lindlar reduction


I thought the step 1) intermediate would be a keto-carboxylate. If so second equiv to add to ketone, no?

Step 2), trans?
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Dan on January 04, 2015, 10:29:13 AM

1. Double addition of of lithiated hexyne to succinic anhydride at low temp (diketone obtained on aqueous workup)
2. Lindlar reduction


I thought the step 1) intermediate would be a keto-carboxylate. If so second equiv to add to ketone, no?

I was hoping that at low T the tetrahedral intermediate would be stable enough to do this:

i.e.

Stable at low T?
C1(=O)OC(O)(C#CCCCC)CC1  :rarrow:  C1(O)(C#CCCCC)OC(O)(C#CCCCC)CC1
[but with OLi instead of OH - smiles won't let me have Li...]

I don't have journal access at the moment so I can't check precedent until next week...

Quote
Step 2), trans?

Oops. Of course Lindlar will give Z-alkenes - though this should not be a problem given their ultimate fate.

Alternative reduction methods (e.g. Cr(II) salts Link (https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-1986-31616)) could be used to get the E-enones shown.
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Altered State on January 05, 2015, 03:57:22 PM
Shouldn't we propose a new problem? It's been a few days from Saturday.
What do you think about this? http://pubs.acs.org/JACSbeta/jvi/images/issue29/ol403350e.jpg
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: kriggy on January 05, 2015, 04:19:14 PM
Shouldn't we propose a new problem? It's been a few days from Saturday.
What do you think about this? http://pubs.acs.org/JACSbeta/jvi/images/issue29/ol403350e.jpg

Seems to me that someone has too much free time  :P
(or are you looking for ideas how to start total synthesis  ;D )
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: Altered State on January 05, 2015, 06:46:51 PM
Shouldn't we propose a new problem? It's been a few days from Saturday.
What do you think about this? http://pubs.acs.org/JACSbeta/jvi/images/issue29/ol403350e.jpg

Seems to me that someone has too much free time  :P
(or are you looking for ideas how to start total synthesis  ;D )

A bit of free time after Christmas :P
I don't really care about the molecule, but the hung is that this is supposed to be a weekly thing, if we don't stock to that, it will probably die again... I've experienced it similar (though unrelated) threads in other forums.
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: kriggy on January 06, 2015, 03:59:57 AM
I see. Maybe wait till tommorow if ptth will start new thread?
Title: Re: POTW 27-12-14
Post by: phth on January 06, 2015, 05:10:52 AM
(https://www.chemicalforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fr6416UE.png%3F1&hash=7cd1b84541d7c5ee01e72d3429ea865eb066007e)