Chemical Forums
Chemistry Forums for Students => High School Chemistry Forum => Topic started by: Alex koosha on January 30, 2016, 10:14:54 AM
-
I have 4.6 gram of starch and I want to add 30 % of sorbitol to xylan. How much gram of sorbitol, should I weigh on the balance?
-
4,6 g = 100%. How much is now 30%
-
Is 1.96 gram of sorbitol needed correct?
-
starch ≠ xylan
?
-
Sorry I meant starch not xylan.
-
As a side question
Are you actually measuring out the stuff or is this theoretical?
-
Is 1.96 gram of sorbitol needed correct?
How do you calculate that?
-
I want sorbitol to be 30% of the total amount. So if I have 70 % starch I have 4.6 g and if I want to have 100 % then how much starch it would be which becomes 6.5.
X=4.6*100/70= 6.50
Then I deducted 6.5 from 4.6 which it becomes 6.5-4.6=1.96 gram of sorbitol should be added to the starch.
-
...
X=4.6*100/70= 6.50
...
Why 6.50 and not 6.57?
-
Sorry 6.57 and then 1.97 gram of sorbitol.
Is my calculation sounded logical to you?
-
Every calculation can be checked, in this case using definition of percentage.
-
Sorry 6.57 and then 1.97 gram of sorbitol.
Is my calculation sounded logical to you?
In the beginning you said you have 4,6 g Starch and want to add 30% of Sorbitol.
In this case its 4,6 g * 0,3 = 1,38 g, what you had to add.
-
Which one?
I have 4.6 gram of starch and I want to add 30 % of sorbitol
I want sorbitol to be 30% of the total amount.
These are two different problems and two different answers!
-
Thank you for your reply. I meant the 2nd one. I want sorbitol to be 30% of the total amount. So, what is the correct answer?
-
Simply checking
-
What did you mean. I didnt get it :)
-
Is 1.97 gram of sorbitol correct?
-
Yes it is.
-
Thank you
-
Since the thread has come to an end, I thought I could pose some thoughts without hijacking.
Sometimes I think too much!
When I did this problem my result was
1.9714285714285714285714285714286
(well, that is as far as my calculator went).
Now the only value we had as a given not including the percents was 4.6 grams.
So I assumed that my value needed to be rounded.
What I am not sure of is what the current Pedagogy or practice suggests as the level of rounding.
Is it 2.0 or 1.97 or 1.971 or 1.9714.
The triple beam balance I use goes to 0.1 grams.
I could only measure 2.0 grams as the closest value.
That level of rounding would match the original base number as 4.6.
I also use a digital scale that goes to 0.01 grams.
I could then measure 1.97 grams.
But would the original base number have been noted as 4.60?
And lastly I know there are scales that measure to 0.0001 grams.
So I could measure 1.9714 grams.
But then would the original base number be 4.6000?
My friend just called me pedantic for even thinking about this problem.
I know I knew the answer to this at sometime but can not articulate it - so I mention it here.
-
Both numbers from the opening post have 2 significant digits, so 2.0 seems a reasonable rounding.