Chemical Forums

Chemistry Forums for Students => Analytical Chemistry Forum => Topic started by: masspecs on September 25, 2017, 03:05:31 PM

Title: How to determine the limit of detection?
Post by: masspecs on September 25, 2017, 03:05:31 PM
Hello. I am developing an HPLC method for the quantitation of a substance at a particular wavelength. I had no idea as to the limit of detection, as this is a new product, so I ran 5 calibration standards: 0 ppm (solvent blank), 62.5 ppm, 125 ppm, 250 ppm, and 500 ppm. Using the calibration curve from the responses, and the formulae LOD = 3*[(std deviation)/(slope)] & LOQ = 10*[(std deviation)/(slope)], I found my LOD and LOQ to be 102 and 340 ppm, respectively.

These seem to be exorbitantly high, compared with the smallest non-blank standard of 62.5, which gave me a well-behaved chromatogram. My boss wants to know why the LOD and LOQ are what they are compared to the 62.5 ppm standard, and I have no answers for him. I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or if I just lack the statistical knowledge to explain why my work is correct (if it is). The software I'm using is old and doesn't offer any help in the way of automatic LOD determination. With this information, can someone tell me if I'm OK with those LOD and LOQ numbers, or did I mess up somewhere?
Title: Re: How to determine the limit of detection?
Post by: Arkcon on September 25, 2017, 07:20:26 PM
When you use the formula:

Quote
nd the formulae LOD = 3*[(std deviation)/(slope)]

You are supposed to use the values for the noise in a blank, or perhaps, some region of a standard run that contains nothing.  Is that what you did?

You're implying that you applied the formula to some standard runs, but what signals do you get in each case?  You LOQ could be high, but if its adequate you may have to use it.  But if your signals are low, or poorly repeatable, they may be driving the LOQ up.
Title: Re: How to determine the limit of detection?
Post by: chlorinecrown on October 03, 2017, 10:45:49 AM
The standard deviation you should be using is for multiple analyses at the same concentration. You could also use the standard deviation of the recoveries, that is, the reading you got at each concentration divided by what the concentration really is. The standard deviation among things at different concentrations is going to naturally be much larger than the value you're actually interested in.