August 24, 2019, 02:14:03 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Percentage error  (Read 141 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline atiemoharry

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Percentage error
« on: July 15, 2019, 06:47:22 AM »
I’m studying A-level Chemistry currently and I’m nearing the end of writing my first lab report. In my evaluation section I am discussing percentage error in the experiment and I am wondering whether percentage error needs the plus-minus symbol?

Offline chenbeier

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 547
  • Mole Snacks: +52/-13
  • Gender: Male
Re: Percentage error
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2019, 07:30:51 AM »
Is your reasult +-%? What experiment was done?

Percentage is normaly use for some concentration of chemicals (acids, base, alcohole) or for calculation of a yield. There is no +-.

Offline Corribus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2699
  • Mole Snacks: +433/-20
  • Gender: Male
  • A lover of spectroscopy and chocolate.
Re: Percentage error
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2019, 10:13:07 AM »
There's no standard way to do this. It's just important to be clear what you mean, and how the error was calculated. In general your error should have the same precision as your value.

For instance, if the value you obtained is 15.0 mg with an error of 10.0%, you could write

15.0 ± 1.5 mg

Or you could just write 15.0 mg with an error of 10.0%. But be advised that this can be ambiguous, because do you mean there is a total variation of 10% (5% above and 5% below) or do you mean a total variation of 20% with 10% above and 10% below the mean. One way I do NOT like is 15.0 mg ± 10%, simply because this can be ambiguous also at times; for example if your value has a unit of percent (e.g., % crystallinity).

Although I wrote it above, it bears repeating that you need to define what "% error" even means, and how many replicates you calculated it over.
What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?  - Richard P. Feynman

Sponsored Links