April 20, 2024, 01:09:09 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: dif btw electrostatic and electrovalent bond  (Read 6519 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wonderkid

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-10
dif btw electrostatic and electrovalent bond
« on: July 08, 2006, 01:58:16 PM »
what are the differences btw the bonds?

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: dif btw electrostatic and electrovalent bond
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2006, 03:04:18 PM »
I've never seen the term electrovalent before. Is it the same as covalent?

Covalent bonds involve shared electrons forming bonds (ie valence electrons in bonding orbitals).

Electrostatic bonds (eg. ionic bonds) are just a result coulombic interactions. ie + sticks to - , but there is no sharing (or bonding orbitals)
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: dif btw electrostatic and electrovalent bond
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2006, 08:33:08 AM »
I googled the definition of electrovalent,

electrovalent = bonding by electrostatic attraction

To me, that says there is no difference.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline wereworm73

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 179
  • Mole Snacks: +21/-4
Re: dif btw electrostatic and electrovalent bond
« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2006, 02:31:51 PM »
This is from a Random House College Dictionary: 

electrovalence - n. Chem, 1. the valence of an ion, equal to the number of positive or negative charges acquired by an atom through a loss or gain of electrons. 2.  Also called electrovalent bond, ionic bond.  the bond formed between two ions through the transfer of electrons.


So, I'd say electrovalent, electrostatic & ionic bonds are all the same thing.






Offline Yggdrasil

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3215
  • Mole Snacks: +485/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Physical Biochemist
Re: dif btw electrostatic and electrovalent bond
« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2006, 06:17:52 PM »
Would dipole-dipole interactions count as electrostatic bonds, since they technically are a type of electrostatic interaction?

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: dif btw electrostatic and electrovalent bond
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2006, 07:00:14 AM »
Would dipole-dipole interactions count as electrostatic bonds, since they technically are a type of electrostatic interaction?

I would have thought so, Hydrogen bonds too.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Yggdrasil

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3215
  • Mole Snacks: +485/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Physical Biochemist
Re: dif btw electrostatic and electrovalent bond
« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2006, 03:36:35 PM »
So in that case, I would say that electrostatic bonds would be a more broad term encompassing all interactions between molecules with regions of positive and negative charge.  Electrovalent/ionic bonds would be a specific type of electrostatic bond which involves molecules with opposite formal charges.

Offline P-man

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
  • Mole Snacks: +13/-17
  • Gender: Male
  • Join Smart People for a better future...
    • My Website
Re: dif btw electrostatic and electrovalent bond
« Reply #7 on: August 16, 2006, 10:21:17 AM »
Are you saying Hydrogen bonds are electrostatic? Then I am confused... or I forget.
Pierre.

Fight for the protection of our envrionmenta and habitat: http://www.wearesmartpeople.com

Sponsored Links