March 28, 2024, 10:39:11 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Inducing Thermal Degradation of Molecules  (Read 1572 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mrydberg

  • Guest
Inducing Thermal Degradation of Molecules
« on: September 09, 2019, 07:45:41 PM »
Is anyone here familiar with current techniques by which molecules are thermally decomposed before analysis? Either to analyze the fragments or to measure the thermal stability of the molecules. What are the most common and/or the most effective ways to conduct these types of temperature studies? I have heard of pyrolysis devices being used in tandem with GC-MS. Are there more techniques such as this? I really appreciate any help.

Offline Corribus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3471
  • Mole Snacks: +526/-23
  • Gender: Male
  • A lover of spectroscopy and chocolate.
Re: Inducing Thermal Degradation of Molecules
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2019, 08:10:10 PM »
Thermogravimetric analysis coupled to FTIR or MS.

EDIT: As an example: https://www.tainstruments.com/evolved-gas-analysis-tgaftir/
What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?  - Richard P. Feynman

mrydberg

  • Guest
Re: Inducing Thermal Degradation of Molecules
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2019, 08:00:41 PM »
Thank you for this information Corribus. I have one more question if you don't mind. What would be some advantages, if any, of using a Py/GC/MS setup versus a TG/GC/MS? Assuming in the first setup the pyrolysis is carried out by passing the sample through a chamber where it is heated resistively. Thanks again for your help it is much appreciated?

Offline Corribus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3471
  • Mole Snacks: +526/-23
  • Gender: Male
  • A lover of spectroscopy and chocolate.
Re: Inducing Thermal Degradation of Molecules
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2019, 09:52:02 PM »
Well, TGA includes pyrolysis. What you get extra with TGA is that you also measure weight loss (that's the G in TGA) while you are tracking the decomposition process. This gives you a lot of extra information that you can use for composition analysis. For instance, you can look at how the weight changes as a function of temperature and deconvolute the data to see how many discrete reaction steps there are, what temperatures they occur at, etc. TGA has a lot of other uses as well beyond pyrolysis. You can do sorption and water content measurements, oxidation induction experiments, kinetic measurements, and so forth. Most TGAs will allow you to do the heating under several different gases, so you can do combustion measurements, or track decomposition decoupled from oxygen exposure. Basically, it's a more sophisticated instrument.  But, if all you want to do is burn the sample and see what the decomposition products are, then TGA may be too much for what you need.

Addendum: I don't know a lot about straight up pyrolysis measurements, but in TGA the sample size is typically very small, 30-50 mg at most. You place the sample in a little pan, which is then hung on a hangwire attached to a balance and then the furnace encloses it. It's incredibly sensitive but not well suited to large samples or samples with highly inhomogenous components. Because it's a sensitive balance, it's not good to have where there will be a lot of vibrations. So, those may be additional reasons a TGA may not be suitable. I couldn't tell you if pyrolysis equipment would be better for these kinds of samples because I've always used TGA for my thermal decomposition measurements. If you're in the market for some of this equipment, I can heartily recommend TA Instruments for any of your thermal analysis needs- they make fantastic equipment and their software is not bad either. We have their DMA, TGA, and DSC in our lab and they make a really nice and powerful set.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2019, 10:03:47 PM by Corribus »
What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?  - Richard P. Feynman

Sponsored Links