April 16, 2024, 12:48:44 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Hybridisation in Fe(CN)2  (Read 7950 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline xstrae

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 131
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-5
  • Gender: Male
  • Life rocks!
Hybridisation in Fe(CN)2
« on: August 23, 2006, 01:01:29 PM »
Hi,
How do you find the hybridisation in Fe(CN)2? Can someone please explain?

Offline jennielynn_1980

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 167
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • Gender: Female
Re: Hybridisation in Fe(CN)2
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2006, 02:08:08 PM »
Try writing out the electron configuration of the elements or making a Lewis dot diagram.

I don't know if that would help but that would be where I would start.  Then you can look at see where it would be most likely to find a hybridization.

Offline xstrae

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 131
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-5
  • Gender: Male
  • Life rocks!
Re: Hybridisation in Fe(CN)2
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2006, 12:29:11 PM »
yup tried all that. is it d2sp3?

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Hybridisation in Fe(CN)2
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2006, 04:35:02 PM »
Just treat it as an ionic salt. Fe2+ and CN-
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline jennielynn_1980

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 167
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • Gender: Female
Re: Hybridisation in Fe(CN)2
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2006, 06:16:13 PM »
yup tried all that. is it d2sp3?

which element is this the configuration for?

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Hybridisation in Fe(CN)2
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2006, 06:19:48 PM »
The two competing bonding theories are VESPR and MO. Hybridization is VESPR theory and once VESPR needs d-orbitals to explain main group element bonding its far better and more accurate to use MO theory. Thus, I don't know the answer to your question jennielynn, since I will avoid d-orbital hybridization like the plague; especially, when MO theory is much more satisfying in those cases.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline xstrae

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 131
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-5
  • Gender: Male
  • Life rocks!
Re: Hybridisation in Fe(CN)2
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2006, 08:48:28 PM »
Quote
which element is this the configuration for?

Fe but I am not sure if it is correct. As Mitch suggested I treater it as an ionic bond.

Offline AWK

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7979
  • Mole Snacks: +555/-93
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hybridisation in Fe(CN)2
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2006, 08:18:12 AM »
I think Fe(CN)2 is covalent, not ionic.
AWK

Offline xstrae

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 131
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-5
  • Gender: Male
  • Life rocks!
Re: Hybridisation in Fe(CN)2
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2006, 04:10:50 AM »
Quote
I think Fe(CN)2 is covalent, not ionic
of course, but its easier to determine the hybridisation if you consider it to be ionic.

Sponsored Links