May 26, 2020, 08:07:34 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Determination of phosphorus by Quimociac Reagent ?  (Read 304 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kiloa

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Determination of phosphorus by Quimociac Reagent ?
« on: February 21, 2020, 01:11:07 PM »
hello everybody,
I face a problem with this determination as the following, effervescence of sample aliquote after adding Quimociac Reagent!!. i want to know the reason, kindly guide me. 

Offline chenbeier

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1011
  • Mole Snacks: +77/-19
  • Gender: Male
Re: Determination of phosphorus by Quimociac Reagent ?
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2020, 02:42:35 PM »
To less information

Offline kiloa

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Determination of phosphorus by Quimociac Reagent ?
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2020, 03:08:03 PM »
To less information
after digesting solid sample with HNo3 and HCL , take 10 ml of digested solution then add 50 ml quimociac reagent to precipitate phosphorous , at this point when i add quimociac reagent the sample solution is effervescence.

Offline chenbeier

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1011
  • Mole Snacks: +77/-19
  • Gender: Male
Re: Determination of phosphorus by Quimociac Reagent ?
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2020, 03:11:40 PM »
Probably the quimociac is broken. Did you check with a new so├čution.

Offline kiloa

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Determination of phosphorus by Quimociac Reagent ?
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2020, 06:01:01 AM »
Probably the quimociac is broken. Did you check with a new so├čution.
i don't know but the precipitation is formed. you mean check with new prepared reagent or new sample solution?

Offline chenbeier

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1011
  • Mole Snacks: +77/-19
  • Gender: Male
Re: Determination of phosphorus by Quimociac Reagent ?
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2020, 04:07:09 PM »
Probably both.

Sponsored Links