October 11, 2024, 11:57:52 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Oxidation of 2-Butanol  (Read 940 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jackwhacky

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Oxidation of 2-Butanol
« on: February 27, 2021, 08:50:31 AM »
Hello. I saw my online teacher writing the equation for the oxidation of 2-butanol this way:

CH3CH(OH)CH2CH3+1/2 O2 ::equil:: CH3COCH2CH3 + H2O

My question is can I balance it this way correctly instead?

2CH3CH(OH)CH2CH3+O2 ::equil:: 2CH3COCH2CH3 + 2H2O

Thanks!

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27809
  • Mole Snacks: +1808/-411
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Oxidation of 2-Butanol
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2021, 09:43:18 AM »
In a way both are correct. Sometimes it is easier to make a point using coefficient of 1 for the most important reactant in the equation.

As far as I am aware IUPAC doesn't define whether the stoichiometric coefficients should be integer numbers, although in my experience the convention of using set of the smallest integers is the preferred one.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline jackwhacky

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Oxidation of 2-Butanol
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2021, 02:01:09 PM »
I see! It makes much more sense now. Thank you  :)

Offline Vidya

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 839
  • Mole Snacks: +46/-62
  • Gender: Female
  • Online Chemistry and Organic Chemistry tutor
    • Online Chemistry Tutor
Re: Oxidation of 2-Butanol
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2021, 11:46:04 PM »
In one case you are writing equation for one mole of butanol undergoing oxidation and in second case you are writing equation for two moles of butanol.

Sponsored Links