March 29, 2024, 01:30:46 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Molecular Orbital diagram notation question  (Read 1428 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Meter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-3
  • Take what I say with a grain of salt
Molecular Orbital diagram notation question
« on: May 12, 2021, 06:55:13 AM »


For the image above, does σ2pz simply denote the p-orbital that is involved in the formation of the σ-bond, and does  the placement of px, py and pz in the orbital matter as long as all three are included, or will  px, py always be involved in π-bonding and pz in σ-bonding?

Also, I've seen MO diagrams where the placement of the bonding and anti-bonding orbitals alternates between bonding/anti-bonding, whereas here it doesn't. What is the most correct way to do it?

I understand how to draw an MO, but this notation confuses me a little.

Thanks.

Offline Orcio_87

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 440
  • Mole Snacks: +39/-3
Re: Molecular Orbital diagram notation question
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2021, 09:05:02 AM »
Quote
For the image above, does σ2pz simply denote the p-orbital that is involved in the formation of the σ-bond
Yes, it is σ bonding orbital created by overlap of two pz atomic orbitals.
Quote
and does  the placement of px, py and pz in the orbital matter as long as all three are included, or will  px, py always be involved in π-bonding and pz in σ-bonding?
Default orientation assume that atoms lies on YZ plane with Z as principal axis.

Different orientation of atoms will change character of molecular orbitals (σ can be π and vice versa).

Quote
Also, I've seen MO diagrams where the placement of the bonding and anti-bonding orbitals alternates between bonding/anti-bonding, whereas here it doesn't.
Are you blind ? Anti-bonding orbitals are marked with upper * sign.

Offline Meter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-3
  • Take what I say with a grain of salt
Re: Molecular Orbital diagram notation question
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2021, 11:13:12 AM »
Quote
For the image above, does σ2pz simply denote the p-orbital that is involved in the formation of the σ-bond
Yes, it is σ bonding orbital created by overlap of two pz atomic orbitals.
Quote
and does  the placement of px, py and pz in the orbital matter as long as all three are included, or will  px, py always be involved in π-bonding and pz in σ-bonding?
Default orientation assume that atoms lies on YZ plane with Z as principal axis.

Different orientation of atoms will change character of molecular orbitals (σ can be π and vice versa).

Quote
Also, I've seen MO diagrams where the placement of the bonding and anti-bonding orbitals alternates between bonding/anti-bonding, whereas here it doesn't.
Are you blind ? Anti-bonding orbitals are marked with upper * sign.
I meant like this:

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5592
  • Mole Snacks: +319/-22
Re: Molecular Orbital diagram notation question
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2021, 11:25:52 AM »
I am not sure that I understand the question.  The σu* orbital is below the πg orbital in the diagram, but I just assumed that this was done strictly on the basis of which is lower in energy.

Offline Corribus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3471
  • Mole Snacks: +526/-23
  • Gender: Male
  • A lover of spectroscopy and chocolate.
Re: Molecular Orbital diagram notation question
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2021, 11:29:03 AM »
The reason is because any atomic orbitals and molecular orbitals with appropriate symmetry can interact with each other, and the strength of the interactions between orbitals depends on their respective energy separations. Those various energy gaps change as a function of the nuclear core charges and electron configurations. I.e., orbital interactions are complex, even for diatomics. The end result is that there comes a point going down the series X2 where the ordering of the 2p pi and sigma bonding orbitals flip (the 2pi bonding orbitals are lower in energy than the 2sigma bonding orbitals). See the diagram at this link, under the section "Quantum patterns". Of those with a "flipped" configuration, dinitrogen is really the only one with practical relevance.

EDIT: Basically, the atomic s orbitals don't just interact with atomic s orbitals, even though we erroneously draw MO diagrams that way in introductory chemistry. Atomic s orbitals also have the appropriate symmetry to interact with atomic pz orbitals if they are aligned appropriately, which they are in a diatomics. Sometimes those interactions are strong, sometimes not, depending on the mutual energies of the s and p orbitals. And those energies change quite a bit as the nuclear core charges change going across the periodic table. The bonding sigma orbital energies are very sensitive to this, as you can see in the diagram linked to above.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2021, 11:40:42 AM by Corribus »
What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?  - Richard P. Feynman

Offline Meter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-3
  • Take what I say with a grain of salt
Re: Molecular Orbital diagram notation question
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2021, 11:43:30 AM »
Excellent insight, Corribus.

My takeaway from that is I probably shouldn't worry about it right now (on my 2nd semester).

Thanks for the help to all of you. It cleared some things up.

Offline Corribus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3471
  • Mole Snacks: +526/-23
  • Gender: Male
  • A lover of spectroscopy and chocolate.
Re: Molecular Orbital diagram notation question
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2021, 11:49:34 AM »
My recollection is that at general chemistry level you just need to know (1) that those two bonding orbitals (2sigma and 2pi) flip in ordering going across the homonuclear series, with lighter elements being inverted and (2) that nitrogen is the last "inverted" one. If you remember this, you can accurately predict various properties of the homonuclear diatomics (bond order, stability, paramagnetism, etc.). The quantum mechanical reason behind it all is interesting, but not really important until you're in physical chemistry.
What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?  - Richard P. Feynman

Offline Meter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-3
  • Take what I say with a grain of salt
Re: Molecular Orbital diagram notation question
« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2021, 11:55:15 AM »
My recollection is that at general chemistry level you just need to know (1) that those two bonding orbitals (2sigma and 2pi) flip in ordering going across the homonuclear series, with lighter elements being inverted and (2) that nitrogen is the last "inverted" one. If you remember this, you can accurately predict various properties of the homonuclear diatomics (bond order, stability, paramagnetism, etc.). The quantum mechanical reason behind it all is interesting, but not really important until you're in physical chemistry.
As far as I know, that is not on this year's curriculum. I will, however, begin quantum chemistry already next year, so I'm sure I'll have to take these things into consideration in due time.

For now, it seems that the purpose of these exercises (other than learning the basics of MO diagrams) is to utilize the Aufbau principle, Madelung's ordering rules and Hund's rule on something other than the electron configuration of elements. Furthermore, also realizing why molecular bonding is favorable at all (sort of).

Sponsored Links