Yes of course, but why didn't P-31 couple in the previously reported synthesis of this compound? The other H-1 data are consistent with the published data. We will report C-13 data on this compound, which is also consistent with the structure. Only this one minor discrepancy exists, which makes me think that there was a minor reporting error in the previous data. BTW, the quartet is not perfect, suggesting a slightly difference in the magnitudes of the two coupling constants.