December 11, 2024, 09:45:40 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Composition and Properties of Matter ? Physics/Chemistry  (Read 1408 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TheBox

  • Guest
Composition and Properties of Matter ? Physics/Chemistry
« on: November 03, 2024, 11:26:47 AM »
Hello, I am studying basic Chemistry and in an introduction video I have watched , it explains Chemistry as the  study of the composition and properties of matter .

Being an expert in Physics , I found this explanation a bit strange because in Physics we also study the composition and properties of matter .


My question is , is the composition and properties in Chemistry based on a select group of matter elements ? Meaning some elements have no chemical properties ?

I have noticed lots of viewers of this forum never online, perhaps one of you could step up and engage in this discussion too .

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27884
  • Mole Snacks: +1815/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Composition and Properties of Matter ? Physics/Chemistry
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2024, 02:49:20 PM »
There is some overlap, but basically physics and chemistry work on slightly different levels. Physics doesn't care much about how molecules interact and convert into each other, chemistry does.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

TheBox

  • Guest
Re: Composition and Properties of Matter ? Physics/Chemistry
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2024, 03:56:59 PM »
There is some overlap, but basically physics and chemistry work on slightly different levels. Physics doesn't care much about how molecules interact and convert into each other, chemistry does.

Well actually fluid dynamics ,viscosity , density etc can be used for physics or chemistry . Descibing reactions of physical process is a part of physics so chemical reactions apply too because there is physics involved .

In example a pebble has no chemical reaction to another pebble , the pebble has zero chemistry involved.

Chemistry doesn't apply to all matter ? Is my thinking correct of this or does a pebble have chemistry ?

Chemistry is the study of matter that has chemical properties ? Would that be correct ?


Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27884
  • Mole Snacks: +1815/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Composition and Properties of Matter ? Physics/Chemistry
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2024, 05:30:52 PM »
reactions of physical process

No idea what it is intended to mean.

Quote
In example a pebble has no chemical reaction to another pebble , the pebble has zero chemistry involved.

Depends on the pebble. Most don't react chemically, some do, albeit very slowly. Plus, pebble has a chemical composition which allows us to predict its chemical reactions. If you put a dolomite pebble in an acid it will react producing carbon dioxide, this is not something physicists deal with.

Quote
Chemistry doesn't apply to all matter ? Is my thinking correct of this or does a pebble have chemistry ?

Chemistry is the study of matter that has chemical properties ? Would that be correct ?

All matter build of atoms has chemical properties. Is some exotic cases (like plasma for example) chemistry is the least important thing, as it deals with energies much lower that those involved in interactions between ionized atoms present in plasma. Some other types of matter (like quark–gluon plasma or degenerate matter) are also in the interaction energy range that is beyond what chemistry describes.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

TheBox

  • Guest
Re: Composition and Properties of Matter ? Physics/Chemistry
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2024, 06:08:27 PM »


All matter build of atoms has chemical properties.
[/quote]


Well before I leave this forum I will have to disagree with you . All matter does not have chemical properties and not all things are made of atoms .

As with other subjects , I can see that Chemistry has also added a complete garbage to extend the subject educationally .

My house is made of bricks , the bricks of my house do not have a chemical reaction . House bricks don't transition like two chemicals mixing , having a reaction .

Anyway thanks for your time , you have closed too many of my threads for no reason for me to feel welcome on this forum .

Sorry my awkward question make you feel inadequate to answer .

Offline DrCMS

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • Mole Snacks: +212/-84
  • Gender: Male
Re: Composition and Properties of Matter ? Physics/Chemistry
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2024, 10:01:01 AM »
Sorry my awkward question make you feel inadequate to answer .

Your questions were not well worded and so are difficult to answer plus our lack of knowledge about your level of knowledge. 
However you have made a number of statement that are incorrect so I assume you are quite young with a lot to learn but with an attitude that will hinder that.

Offline Corribus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3551
  • Mole Snacks: +546/-23
  • Gender: Male
  • A lover of spectroscopy and chocolate.
Re: Composition and Properties of Matter ? Physics/Chemistry
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2024, 10:48:09 AM »
Well before I leave this forum I will have to disagree with you . All matter does not have chemical properties and not all things are made of atoms .
Nice strawman. Borek did not claim that all things (matter) are made from atoms or that all matter has chemical properties. In fact he clarified that in the sentence right after the one you quoted without context. Beyond that, a nuanced discussion among the well-informed would have to be preceded by placing boundaries around what we mean by "chemical properties" and "matter". But given that you are only at the point of studying the basics of chemistry, I think elementary definitions would suffice.

Quote
As with other subjects , I can see that Chemistry has also added a complete garbage to extend the subject educationally .
Don't even know what that means.

Quote
My house is made of bricks , the bricks of my house do not have a chemical reaction . House bricks don't transition like two chemicals mixing , having a reaction .

This is a perplexing line of argument.

It is true that brick houses don't spontaneously burst into flames or dissolve to nothing right before your eyes, at least on Earth. From that, you fallaciously conclude that bricks aren't subject to chemistry or don't have chemical properties? Interesting chain of logic.

How do you think the rocks and other components in those bricks were formed, or the bricks themselves? It wasn't through magic. Also, the fact that bricks appear chemically stable under the usual (Earth-based) atmospheric conditions does not mean they can't exhibit chemical changes under more extreme conditions.

Bricks are mostly composed of clays and various other metal oxides and metalloid oxides that have had the water baked out of them. Clays are predominantly aluminosilicates with traces of other elements; at the molecular scale they usually have platelike structures. We have a lot of different techniques at our disposal to measure how the atoms in clay particles are arranged, and how those arrangements affect their chemical properties. A lot of chemistry happens when wet, raw clay bricks are fired in a kiln, which causes bound and unbound water (a chemist would use terms like chemisorbed and physisorbed) to dissociate from the clay and individual clay platelets fuse together and harden. The changes are far more complex than just "water leaves", because water molecules have strong chemical interactions with the Si-O and Al-O bonds on the clay particle surfaces. This process requires a lot of energy. "Energy causing a change in molecular structure" could be a basic definition of a chemical process, and it is clearly evident here in the process of changing raw clay into a clay brick.

Anyway, the "molecules" (I use the term loosely here) that make up clays (raw or baked) are already oxidized (products of reactions with oxygen), so they are chemically stable under normal, Earthlike atmosphere - meaning that the metal/metalloid oxide structures do not easily change. Metal oxides are NOT stable in the presence of strong bases or (for example) hydrofluoric acid. I am fairly certain if you took a whole clay brick and left it submerged in a strong KOH solution, or in a strong HF solution, you would find it (very) slowly dissolves. Probably more effective if you ground the brick up first, but the point remains.

It is difficult to simply rehydrate a fired clay brick because the individual clay platelets that they are made of now have such strong CHEMICAL interactions with each other. This is one of the reasons that bricks are so stable. They do not react with oxygen and the molecules are so strongly bound to each other that water has a hard time getting back in between them. There's an important distinction here that you need to understand. Water will likely interact with the individual clay molecules in a fired clay brick. The chemical stability of a fired clay brick is not so much due to low thermodynamic/chemical reactivity. I suspect it is due to high kinetic stability caused by a diffusion bottleneck. I.e., water has to get to the clay platelets to react with/bind to them, but there are no spaces between the clay molecules any more. The clay brick is, quite literally, as hard and dense as a rock.

(To be up front about it - I am not a mineralogist, much less a clay scientist, so I am probably only scratching the surface here about the chemistry and structure of kiln-fired clays. I would certainly defer to one of them if they swung by and offered a more detailed and informed account of what's actually going on. Nevertheless, general chemical principles certainly apply as a rough guide.)

It is worth noting that, before it is fired and its individual clay molecules get squished together by the mass exodus of bound water, clay actually exhibits a rich chemistry. The surfaces of clay particles can be modified with organic substances that allow precise control over their interlayer spacings. You can also swap out metal ions in the clay (using, you got it, chemicals) to give the clays different properties. You can incorporate clays into organic polymers and other materials to form composites that are more than the sum of their parts. You can bind enzymes and nanoparticles and organic surfactants to them. They can be made into catalysts. I know a lot of this first hand, having done some of this clay manipulation and analysis in my lab.

Clay bricks have no chemistry? An ignorant statement. Clay was turned into bricks using chemistry. Clay bricks can be destroyed using (dangerous) chemistry. The properties of pre-fired clays can be manipulated with chemistry. There is even a whole scientific journal dedicated to the rich chemistry of clays.

Quote
Sorry my awkward question make you feel inadequate to answer .
Your "awkward questions" really don't make a whole lot of sense. Take this word salad in your first post: "Meaning some elements have no chemical properties ?" It belies such a poor foundation in basic chemistry concepts (and, frankly, concepts from your self-claimed area of expertise, physics) that it is hard to even know how to try to educate you. Particularly when you react with haughtiness and hostility to our good-faith attempts. Take some time to learn the terms you are using instead of just throwing out non sequiturs like chemistry is garbage because bricks don't react with each other.

To learn you have to be willing to admit the limits of your knowledge. You came here acknowledging that you are studying "basic chemistry". Your questions are evidence that indeed you do not understand basic chemistry. Borek - a guy with decades of experience chemistry - tries to help you and you instantly turn combative. You arrogantly disagree with his well-reasoned and factually correct answers, despite having no foundation in chemistry. I don't really understand the attitude, tbh.

We can only help those who are really interested in learning.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2024, 11:38:42 AM by Corribus »
What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?  - Richard P. Feynman

Sponsored Links