April 28, 2024, 11:17:08 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: stability of compound  (Read 7612 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline madscientist

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-7
  • University of New England Australia
stability of compound
« on: February 18, 2007, 06:29:03 AM »
Hi all,

I Have a question I need to answer and was wondering what principles I should be looking at to answer it. All I can think of is that is has somthing to do with resonance forms of this compound?

The question reads as follows.

Q.) Explain why tetra(dimethylamino) cyclobutadiene dication is stable?

Any help is appreciated,

Cheers

Madscientist
The only stupid question is a question not asked.

Offline Custos

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 217
  • Mole Snacks: +32/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: stability of compound
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2007, 12:59:49 AM »
Why is the cyclopentadiene anion stable? How many pi electron are there? Think about Hückel's rule. look up aromaticity...

Offline madscientist

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-7
  • University of New England Australia
Re: stability of compound
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2007, 10:10:21 PM »
Ok, so the cyclopentadiene anion is a 6 pi electron system and therefore aromatic by huckels criteria. So the cyclopentadiene anion is stable due to the aromatic stabilisation effect yes?

So if i find that the tetra(dimethylamino) cyclobutadiene dication is aromatic, (2,6,10,14...pi electrons), is that enough to explain the stability of this compound?

Thanks for your help,

cheers

Madscientist
« Last Edit: February 20, 2007, 08:46:23 PM by madscientist »
The only stupid question is a question not asked.

Offline Custos

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 217
  • Mole Snacks: +32/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: stability of compound
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2007, 02:20:13 AM »
Yes, that's correct.

Offline english

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 534
  • Mole Snacks: +31/-10
  • Gender: Male
  • grad student
Re: stability of compound
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2007, 03:42:10 AM »
By first glance the cyclopentadiene anion does not look like it's aromatic.  In fact, it looks as if it's antiaromatic (or not aromatic—a compound would rather be not aromatic than antiaromatic).

If you look at its resonance structures, like you mentioned, the anionic pair of electrons is delocalized across the entire cyclic plane, and thus each carbon is at some point sp2 hybridized.  This means there is actually a cyclic pi cloud.  This would follow Huckel's rule, that there are 4n + 2 pi electrons, and we can therefore conclude that cyclopentadienyl ion is aromatic.

Offline madscientist

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-7
  • University of New England Australia
Re: stability of compound
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2007, 02:59:23 AM »
Thanks for your help guys.

Cheers,

madscientist
The only stupid question is a question not asked.

Offline AhmedEzatAlzawalaty

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 191
  • Mole Snacks: +4/-31
  • Gender: Male
Re: stability of compound
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2007, 09:15:11 AM »
  i think it is very simple .in cyclobutadiene anion teh Compond is
1-Cyclic
2-planar SP2
3-The pi electron system is continous and not interrupted
4-It obeys Huckle Rule 4n+2=6
From first sight it is aromatic
.

Offline madscientist

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-7
  • University of New England Australia
Re: stability of compound
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2007, 04:04:15 PM »
On the original question, as to why the tetra(dimethylamino) cyclobutadiene dication is stable.

I understand that its stable because its aromatic, but ive found another answer which im told is right but i can't understand why, the answer given is below:

"Cyclobutadiene dication is a 4n+2 (n=0) pi system. From the graphical method, the only bonding orbital is doubly occupied.  In addition the four nitrogen lone pairs on the amino groups can stabilise the positive charge."

The first part of this answer makes sense because it basically saying that the compound is aromatic with its lowest energy orbitals doubly occupied, therefore stable.  What i dont get is how the nitrogen lone pairs can act to stabilise the positive charge, the way im seeing it is if the lone pairs were to do this the compound would not be aromatic.  Can anyone please explain this answer to me.
The only stupid question is a question not asked.

Offline madscientist

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-7
  • University of New England Australia
Re: stability of compound
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2007, 06:36:49 AM »
Can anyone see the picture i attached in the last post?
The only stupid question is a question not asked.

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27665
  • Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: stability of compound
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2007, 07:14:52 AM »
Picture OK.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Sponsored Links