April 25, 2024, 09:02:43 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Nomenclature: isopropyl  (Read 7809 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Winga

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 510
  • Mole Snacks: +39/-10
Nomenclature: isopropyl
« on: January 07, 2005, 12:05:06 AM »
According to IUPAC, it is 1-methylethyl.

Is there any abbreviation that just call it methylethyl?
(is it acceptable?)
« Last Edit: January 07, 2005, 12:05:56 AM by Winga »

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re:Nomenclature: isopropyl
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2005, 12:55:39 AM »
isopropyl is the abbreviation because it has 9 letters, methylethyl has 11.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

dexangeles

  • Guest
Re:Nomenclature: isopropyl
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2005, 01:53:40 AM »
if i remember right, isopropyl is the old name even before IUPAC nomenclature was established, but it is still an accepted name

Offline Winga

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 510
  • Mole Snacks: +39/-10
Re:Nomenclature: isopropyl
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2005, 02:59:59 AM »
Sorry, my question is that can I use methylethyl instead of 1-methylethyl?

dexangeles

  • Guest
Re:Nomenclature: isopropyl
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2005, 07:14:53 PM »
i don't see why not, i see them in names in bottles for experiments all the time  :-\

if it's in the 2 carbon, then it won't be methylethyl, but plain propyl
good question though

i wanna see other answers to this now that you re-phrased the question

Offline Winga

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 510
  • Mole Snacks: +39/-10
Re:Nomenclature: isopropyl
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2005, 12:55:27 AM »
But, is methylethyl acceptable according to IUPAC?

nocommentes

  • Guest
Re:Nomenclature: isopropyl
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2005, 07:37:14 AM »
I think, that it would be better to call that radical as isopropil, it will allow to show every body your knowlege on Nomenclature. In articles authors usually use i-Pr - it's easier for understandig!

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re:Nomenclature: isopropyl
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2005, 09:09:38 PM »
Winga: No, it would not be. IUPAC has funny rules. If an abbreviation exists such that it has less letters than an other abbreviation, then the abbreviation with the smallest amount of letters must be used.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

dexangeles

  • Guest
Re:Nomenclature: isopropyl
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2005, 11:33:23 PM »
hmmm, but isopropyl is not IUPAC nomenclature right?
isn't it an old name that is just still accepted?
my book says it's 1-methylethyl, but isopropyl is acceptable still.

Sponsored Links