What do you mean by "shim off the FID"? And I always thought you *need* deuterated solvents to do NMR's, otherwise you won't be able to visualize anything?
a common misconception. the deuterated solvents perform two functions, to provide a signal to lock/shim from, and provide a clean spectrum without solvent peaks.
Originally, these were big issues in NMR, but instrumentation is so good these days that you can get away with a few tricks.
For a lock signal, you only need a trace of something deuterated in the sample, i have run spectra of crude reaction mixtures in 9:1 CH2Cl2:CDCl3 no worries. In shimming, you are just trying to smooth the magnetic field over the sample, in order to gain the maximum signal. This is normally done by trying to maximise the 2H signal from the deuterated solvent, however the principle is general for any signal. In FID shimming, you collect and display a series of 1 scan 1H spectra, and optimise the signal of the FID by adjusting the shims to give a long, regular decay. Its actually pretty easy. And for the signal problem; it isn't really an issue. You can do work arounds, like collecting heteroatom spectra, or adjusting your spectral width to ignore solvent signals, and just collect the regions of interest (like you would do). Alternatively, in order to see sample signals amongst big solvent signals, your instrument only need be able to collect signals varying roughly over an intensity range of 1-1000. This is not a problem for any modern spectrometer, for example see this org lett paper, DOI: 10.1021/ol049979