Do u agree that science is the major cause of the environmental hazards around the world today ?? i need several points since im debating this againts my instructor.. i am going to be in affirmative parties..
Phrased like this, it's going to be hard to write a decent debate. Like AWK:
said, "Which science?" I suppose if you mean any and all technological advancements, then yes, knapping flint was the beginning of the end for sustainable human interaction with the environment, but so what? Like Polleke:
said, it's really more about greed, but then, that's the counter point your opponent's likely to take. I don't know what you're going to say, unless you have some more specific examples.