Chemical Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Sponsored links

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Question about U.S. patent 3,781,289 by the Upjohn Company regarding Triazolo's  (Read 3391 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

williamrobinson57

  • New Member
  • **
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7

On page 10 of the patent, example 6, it states that after the first method resulted in "8-chloro-1-methyl-6-phenyl-4H-s-triazol(4,3-a)(1,4)benzodiazepine".  It also states that it yielded "8-chloro-1-methyl-6-phenyl-4H-s-triazolo(4,3-a)(1,4) benzodiazepine". 

If alprazolam is "8-chloro-1-methyl-6-phenyl-4H-s-triazolo(4,3-a)(1,4)benzodiazepine", what is the difference between that chemical and "8-chloro-1-methyl-6-phenyl-4H-s-triazol(4,3-a)(1,4)benzodiazepine".

 
Logged

Arkcon

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Mole Snacks: +533/-146
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7360

Patents are specifically written to satisfy the need to specify clearly what is being claimed in the patent, but at the same time to be deliberately too ambiguous to copy. If the document truly says the same thing three times as if they were 3 different things, well, that really is just that, and nothing else.
Logged
Hey, I'm not judging.  I just like to shoot straight.  I'm a man of science.

Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Mitch Andre Garcia's Chemical Forums 2003-Present.

Page created in 0.1 seconds with 19 queries.