September 23, 2019, 01:15:45 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: stochiometry  (Read 3340 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ahawk1

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 54
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
stochiometry
« on: February 02, 2009, 05:11:14 PM »

Offline Astrokel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 989
  • Mole Snacks: +65/-10
  • Gender: Male
Re: stochiometry
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2009, 05:22:35 PM »
It looks correct to me perhaps they want it in the form of 4 sf and expoential form?
No matters what results are waiting for us, it's nothing but the DESTINY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline ahawk1

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 54
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: stochiometry
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2009, 05:26:49 PM »
It looks correct to me perhaps they want it in the form of 4 sf and expoential form?
thanks i used two sig figs and it gave the answer to me! =]

Offline ARGOS++

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1489
  • Mole Snacks: +199/-56
  • Gender: Male
Re: stochiometry
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2009, 05:32:02 PM »
Dear ahawk1;

I got first another MW for decaborane, and second really another left over.

You may try the Diagram with your corrected data and you will easily get the correct answer:
Therein is also an Example Diagram:  How to do a "Stoichiometry Problem".

Good Luck!
                    ARGOS++

Formulas, in its best sense,  ARE ONLY Recipes for “A Picture”,  —
     If you DON’T catch “The Picture”, you are lost, - for ever!      (A++)

There is ONLY one correct Formula for the “Hydrogen”:  —
     The Atom/Molecule, ITSSELF!                          (Dr. R. Mory  1968)

"Make it AS SIMPLE AS possible,  — BUT NEVER SIMPLER!"  (A. Einstein)

Sponsored Links