October 14, 2019, 09:35:34 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting

### Topic: stochiometry  (Read 3362 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### ahawk1

• Regular Member
• Posts: 54
• Mole Snacks: +0/-0
##### stochiometry
« on: February 02, 2009, 05:11:14 PM »

#### Astrokel

• Full Member
• Posts: 989
• Mole Snacks: +65/-10
• Gender:
##### Re: stochiometry
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2009, 05:22:35 PM »
It looks correct to me perhaps they want it in the form of 4 sf and expoential form?
No matters what results are waiting for us, it's nothing but the DESTINY!!!!!!!!!!!!

#### ahawk1

• Regular Member
• Posts: 54
• Mole Snacks: +0/-0
##### Re: stochiometry
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2009, 05:26:49 PM »
It looks correct to me perhaps they want it in the form of 4 sf and expoential form?
thanks i used two sig figs and it gave the answer to me! =]

#### ARGOS++

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 1489
• Mole Snacks: +199/-56
• Gender:
##### Re: stochiometry
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2009, 05:32:02 PM »
Dear ahawk1;

I got first another MW for decaborane, and second really another left over.

You may try the Diagram with your corrected data and you will easily get the correct answer:
Therein is also an Example Diagram:  How to do a "Stoichiometry Problem".

Good Luck!
ARGOS++

Formulas, in its best sense,  ARE ONLY Recipes for “A Picture”,  —
If you DON’T catch “The Picture”, you are lost, - for ever!      (A++)

There is ONLY one correct Formula for the “Hydrogen”:  —
The Atom/Molecule, ITSSELF!                          (Dr. R. Mory  1968)

"Make it AS SIMPLE AS possible,  — BUT NEVER SIMPLER!"  (A. Einstein)