April 26, 2024, 06:57:27 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Why is a methyl radical sp2 and not sp3 hybridized?  (Read 10416 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline l_johan_k

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Why is a methyl radical sp2 and not sp3 hybridized?
« on: April 09, 2009, 05:35:40 AM »
Why is a methyl radical sp2- and not sp3-hybridized?
Wouldn't it be more favourable to have the unpaired electron at a further distance from the bonding pairs?

Offline AWK

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7979
  • Mole Snacks: +555/-93
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why is a methyl radical sp2 and not sp3 hybridized?
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2009, 08:18:46 AM »
Try VSEPR
AWK

Offline l_johan_k

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: Why is a methyl radical sp2 and not sp3 hybridized?
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2009, 04:46:12 AM »
Try VSEPR
But wouldn't VSEPR indicate that the radical should be sp3-hybridized (since the angle, between the unpaired electron and the bonding pairs, is 109,5o in the sp3-hybridized structure, but only 90o in the sp2-hybridized structure)?

Offline AWK

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7979
  • Mole Snacks: +555/-93
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why is a methyl radical sp2 and not sp3 hybridized?
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2009, 01:19:11 AM »
But also you can consider sp2 and  1 electron on unhybridized p-orbital
AWK

Offline sanderol

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 41
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-1
Re: Why is a methyl radical sp2 and not sp3 hybridized?
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2009, 05:52:51 AM »
But also you can consider sp2 and  1 electron on unhybridized p-orbital

ditto.

It can be sp3, although not with a methyl radical. But if it has electronegative substituents on the radical carbon it gets more sp3. Reactionwise this will not change a thing since the inversion energy is very low.

Sponsored Links