April 25, 2024, 05:25:52 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: problem regarding aromatic substituent effect...  (Read 5334 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pesona3f

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 24
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
problem regarding aromatic substituent effect...
« on: April 21, 2009, 04:47:20 AM »
whats the difference between inductive effect and resonance effect??

i read this sentence in mcmurry organic chem book
'note again that halogens, alkoxy, hydroxyl and amino groups withdraw electron inductively and donate electron by resonance'

from what i know, hydroxyl and amino (NH2) is activator and make benzene ring more reactive toward electrophilic substitution.. if it withdraw electron inductively, doesn't it make the benzene ring less reactive???

Offline azmanam

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1417
  • Mole Snacks: +160/-24
  • Mediocrity is a handrail -Charles Louis d'Secondat
Re: problem regarding aromatic substituent effect...
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2009, 06:01:09 AM »
yes, because halogens are electronegative, they deactivate the benzene ring... but because they have lone pairs (like oxygen and nitrogen) then can donate those lone pairs into the benzene ring to activate the ring.  it's a paradox.

in the end, resonance wins - but electronegativity mitigates resonance - and halogens are slightly activating groups.  they're o,p directors.
Knowing why you got a question wrong is better than knowing that you got a question right.

Offline pesona3f

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 24
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: problem regarding aromatic substituent effect...
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2009, 06:09:20 AM »
thankz, thats really give me an idea  ;D ;D

Offline Dolphinsiu

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-7
  • Gender: Male
Re: problem regarding aromatic substituent effect...
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2009, 06:13:02 AM »
Inductive effect will help benzene to be activated or deactivated. If an electron donating group is attached to benzene (in monosubstituted way), ortho or para directing is favored for electrophilic addition since carbocation formed in the intermediate is more stabilized. If an electron withdrawing group is attached to benzene, meta directing is favored for the same reason.

Resonance effect just enhance the stability of benzene when electrophilic attack is suffered. The more the canonical form the compound bears, the more stable is the compound towards electrophilic attack. That is why sometimes only ortho directing is favored.

Offline aldoxime_amine

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 191
  • Mole Snacks: +7/-4
Re: problem regarding aromatic substituent effect...
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2009, 06:47:26 AM »
in the end, resonance wins - but electronegativity mitigates resonance - and halogens are slightly activating groups.  they're o,p directors.

Are you sure?

My teacher emphasised quite often that halogens are weak deactivators, yet o-p directors the reason being their high electronegativity predominating over their resonance effect. For in case of -Cl,-Br,-I, overlap is 3p-2p,4p-2p and 5p-2p respectively in the C-X linkage in aryl halides.
-F is just too electronegative.

Offline pesona3f

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 24
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: problem regarding aromatic substituent effect...
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2009, 07:06:37 AM »
alkoxy, amine and hydroxy also inductively electron withdrawing group..

from what i understand when i read your post Dolphinsiu, the prority given to the inductive effect to determine either EWG ot EDG... in that case, OH phenol will have meta director....

Offline azmanam

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1417
  • Mole Snacks: +160/-24
  • Mediocrity is a handrail -Charles Louis d'Secondat
Re: problem regarding aromatic substituent effect...
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2009, 07:51:52 AM »
Quote
Are you sure?

you're right.  on further review (http://www.cem.msu.edu/~reusch/VirtTxtJml/benzrx1.htm#benz1), halogens are weakly deactivating - in that the rate is slower than unsubstituted benzene (that's what activating/deactivating refer to... rate of reaction relative to benzene-H6).  However, they're still o,p-directors.

So when we say 'in the end...' it depends on what 'end' we mean.  For rates, induction wins and the arylhalide reacts slower than benzene.  but for substitution, resonance wins and the arylhalide is an o,p-director.
Knowing why you got a question wrong is better than knowing that you got a question right.

Offline lancenti

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 97
  • Mole Snacks: +4/-4
  • Gender: Male
    • Crystal Spires
Re: problem regarding aromatic substituent effect...
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2009, 09:00:04 AM »
It seems the first question was never really answered.

Inductive Effect is an effect achieved through a sigma bond.

Resonance Effect is an effect achieved through a pi bond.

This should help you decide on the significance of each, depending on the reaction mechanism in question.

Example
Methyl Groups are Electron Donating via Inductive Effect

Phenol Groups are Electron Donating via Resonance Effect

Sponsored Links