April 27, 2024, 09:15:33 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Isotopic Abunmdance  (Read 4100 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline my first name is jack

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Isotopic Abunmdance
« on: April 29, 2009, 07:29:43 PM »
On a test if you are only allowed to use periodic table and calculator how are you able to answer a question like this and what are the steps to answering a question like this...

Lanthanum is composed of two isotopes: La-138 and La-139. What is the percentage abundance of both isotopes?




THANKS TO ALL WHO HELP =D

Offline ARGOS++

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1489
  • Mole Snacks: +199/-56
  • Gender: Male
Re: Isotopic Abunmdance
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2009, 07:44:20 PM »

Dear my first name is jack;

This is a typically problem of two equations with two unknown.

I give you the first equation:      x%   +  y%  =   100 %
Are you able to give the second equation using the periodic table?

Good Luck!
                    ARGOS++

Offline my first name is jack

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Isotopic Abunmdance
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2009, 08:17:19 PM »
how would i be able to give the second equation using the periodic table???
sorry i actually dont understand this at all :(

Offline ARGOS++

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1489
  • Mole Snacks: +199/-56
  • Gender: Male
Re: Isotopic Abunmdance
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2009, 08:41:51 PM »

Dear my first name is jack;

Think about that:   x% 138La   +   y% 139La  must give 100%( = 1.0)
With the periodic table you can do similar:
         x%  * ra(138La)    +     y% * ra(139La)    =   138.9055 amu

And the relative atom masses (ra) are:
      138La  =  137.9071 amu        139La  =  138.9063 amu

Can you now solve the equation system?

Good Luck!
                    ARGOS++

Offline my first name is jack

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Isotopic Abunmdance
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2009, 09:00:17 PM »
On my periodic table it only says La 138.91 so I don't understand how you got...


And the relative atom masses (ra) are:
      138La  =  137.9071 amu        139La  =  138.9063 amu



thanks ARGOS i appreciate your help a lot.

Offline ARGOS++

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1489
  • Mole Snacks: +199/-56
  • Gender: Male
Re: Isotopic Abunmdance
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2009, 09:04:09 PM »

Dear my first name is jack;

You may check on:
              http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Compositions/stand_alone.pl

Good Luck!
                    ARGOS++

Offline my first name is jack

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Isotopic Abunmdance
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2009, 09:29:14 PM »
oh okay but on the test we wont be able to use that information so is there any other way of solving this problem?

Offline ARGOS++

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1489
  • Mole Snacks: +199/-56
  • Gender: Male
Re: Isotopic Abunmdance
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2009, 09:45:13 PM »

Dear my first name is jack;

Then you have to do it less precise with only the assumption from the question:
The relative atom masses (ra):
      138La  =  138.0 amu        139La  =  139.0 amu


Good Luck!
                    ARGOS++

Sponsored Links