March 29, 2024, 05:10:05 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Symmetry  (Read 3358 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 5cienceboy

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Symmetry
« on: January 16, 2010, 01:43:05 PM »
Why would Cr(ethenediamine)33+ be expected to be chiral?

Offline cth

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 223
  • Mole Snacks: +36/-8
Re: Symmetry
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2010, 03:50:24 PM »
In http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octahedral_molecular_geometry, there is the example of [Fe(ox)3]3- which has two configurations named respectively:
Λ-[Fe(ox)3]3− and Δ-[Fe(ox)3]3−
They are mirror image from one another. But, can you supperpose them?

Your case with Cr3+ and ethylenediamine works exactly the same.


I think the best way to see chirality in this case is to build models of both Λ and Δ configurations and to play with them until you're convinced there is no way you can superpose them without breaking a bond.

Offline UG

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 822
  • Mole Snacks: +134/-15
  • Gender: Male
Re: Symmetry
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2010, 06:59:06 PM »
Try and see if you can rotate it around in your head, and as cth said "play with them until you're convinced there is no way you can superpose them without breaking a bond."


Offline Ligander

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 64
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Jah, muidugi kuid ei
    • Schulich Faculty of Chemistry - Technion, Israel
Re: Symmetry
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2010, 07:43:26 PM »
Why would Cr(ethenediamine)33+ be expected to be chiral?
Formally a molecule is not chiral if:
It possesses plane of symmetry or it possesses inversion centre or it possesses improper rotation axis.

Sponsored Links