April 26, 2024, 03:31:56 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Are mechanical analytical balances more precise?  (Read 3358 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Invincible

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Are mechanical analytical balances more precise?
« on: January 26, 2010, 10:58:43 AM »
I use a Mettler AE240 electronic top loading analytical balance.  

If you're just weighing small objects a few percent drift is nothing(i.e. measuring things only weighing less than a gram), but for analytical purpose, it means everything.  I find that calibration drifts several tens of PPM after a few days. 

i.e. tare 88.5526g
add water to determine non volatile component

gross: 125.0000g

allow to evaporate completely... Since I'm trying to quantify TDS from only 36g of sample, a few mg drift from balance would throw off the results significantly.  

With an electronic top loader, there's an issue of corner load in addition to calibration drift, meaning that if the beaker is not placed at exactly the center, it might throw off a few digits too.

So, with this, I'm having to do this:

1.) Calibrate
2.) measure tare
3.) add sample
4.) record

5.) wait...

6.) calibrate again
7.) record and calculate

I understand that with a mechanical substitution balance like Mettler H 8, it's not as "convenient", but it's a hanger type and it does not suffer corner load effect and does not require calibration each and every time.

I couldn't locate the link right now, but I recall reading on a some university lab manual recommending using the mechanical one over an electronic one for work requiring more precision.

Offline marquis

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 393
  • Mole Snacks: +35/-3
Re: Are mechanical analytical balances more precise?
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2010, 08:09:23 PM »
To me, the electronic balances have always been better than mechanical.

In most labs, balances must be calibrated daily.  The first calibration is with the balances internal standard.  The second calibration is with a NIST certified weight.
You check the NIST weight daily.  From this, you get a good idea of any drift with the scale.  A common specification is that the weight (usually 100.0000g) must be within 1.0 mg of the 100g.  Usually, the values are about half of that.

By the way, these are the relatively inexpensive analytical balances (~ $2000).  You do need the balances that block drafts to the weighing chamber, etc.

This sounds close to your procedure.  Don't know a way around the daily checks, especially when accuracy is the major concern.

Sponsored Links