April 25, 2024, 01:36:08 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: (Delta)G and its relation to equilibrium  (Read 2707 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline chrisaltman

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
(Delta)G and its relation to equilibrium
« on: April 27, 2010, 11:04:30 PM »
Hello all,
Quick question: I was given a problem in my GenChemII course.
Essentially, it was as follows:
The A form of a compound is converted into the less dense B form in preparation of an ore.
Use the data provided to calculate the lowest temperature at which the conversion is feasible.

(Delta)Hf (kj/mol) of A-compound: -3055 // S value: 129.3
(Delta)Hf (kj/mol) of B-compound: -3027 // S value: 154.4

I understand that when (Delta)G=0, the reaction is at equilibrium,
but why does that enable us to use the free energy change equation for the transition?
The transition state is at equilibrium, but does that lead us to the assumption
that the B-form of compound is now present?

Offline Schrödinger

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1162
  • Mole Snacks: +138/-98
  • Gender: Male
Re: (Delta)G and its relation to equilibrium
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2010, 01:14:14 AM »
The fact that $$\Delta{G}=0 /$$ at equilibrium hints at the direction in which the reaction will proceed if the temperature is increased or decreased. But you don't have to use $$\Delta{G}=0 /$$ for the transition in order to calculate the minimum temperature at which the reaction is spontaneous.

Instead solve the inequality $$\Delta{G}<0 /$$
i.e., $$ \Delta{H} -T\Delta{S} < 0 /$$
i.e., $$ \Delta{H} < T\Delta{S} /$$
This one's easier to understand
"Destiny is not a matter of chance; but a matter of choice. It is not a thing to be waited for; it is a thing to be achieved."
- William Jennings Bryan

Sponsored Links